2016-08-18 9:12 GMT+02:00 Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com>:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Kain Abel <isoru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Git has no open and close, but also stash.
>
>
> git combines clone/open into a single operation, and each clone is tied to a
> single open copy, whereas fossil separates them: one clone can serve
> multiple local checkouts. The stash information belongs in the checkout, not
> in the clone (otherwise you would see it from all opened checkouts from that
> clone, which would likely just cause confusion).
>
>>
>> A former ;) git user would
>> lose the stash without asking if he uses close (out of whichever
>> reasons) w/o RTfineM. The loss of stashed changes (== working time)
>> could be a disappointment (as an user experience).
>> The key aspect is the loss of information and not the omission of
>> reading the manual.
>
>
> i'm guessing that few people ever use 'close'? (i have never - in over 8
> years - used it except when testing fossil.)
>
>
> --
> ----- stephan beal
> http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
> "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of
> those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
>
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-users mailing list
> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
