On Nov 11, 2016 5:28 PM, "K. Fossil user" <ticketpersonnal-fos...@yahoo.fr>
wrote:
>
> Ah you don't understand again what I've said ...
>
> 1/ Fossil and SQLite work together, and to be clear, the same guy work
for both projects.
> I was even told that the AIM of Fossil is to help SQLite.
> Do you agree at least with these ?

Yes, fossil & sqlite have a beneficial symbiotic relationship.

> 2/ When you plan things you are supposed to create a Gantt chart or
something which help any project.
> For instance, something serious not something else.
> You've said it : Oct 24 Fossil, Nov 04 SQLite.
> I AM SO happy that you've wrote it.

I have no idea what you think I wrote. Gantt charts are not requirements
for successful software. I've written some very successful software
projects that have been recognized with industry awards without ever using
a gantt chart. DRH makes new fossil releases periodically for the community
but he generally suggests using the tip of trunk as he usually does himself.

> Explain me why a SO serious project could not wait for 10 days or if it
is not that possible (I don't see why ??), why don't Fossil create a 1.36.1?

Fossil has never used semantic versioning. I don't understand the reason
for your continued emphasis on 10 days. Perhaps the reason is that people
are imperfect, or that they have different priorities than you, or that
they have simply started blocking your emails due to the in your face "I'm
right and anyone who disagrees with me is a fool" style attitude that comes
across in your messages. No, that is not a quote from you, but it is how
you come across.

There are ways to communicate that invite people to see your point of view.
There are other ways to communicate that make people dislike your message
no matter how correct it might be.

>
> [too much] Pride ? Huh ?
>
> My point was : Why do Fossil show a 1.36 FEW days BEFORE SQLite.
> (FEW days IS the key of MY point of view before yours)

I believe I addressed this above.

>
>
> Best Regards
>
> K.
>
>
> ________________________________
> De : Luca Ferrari <fluca1...@infinito.it>
>
> À : Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org>
> Envoyé le : Vendredi 11 novembre 2016 11h38
> Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually
contains 64bit binary
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 4:16 PM, K. Fossil user
> <ticketpersonnal-fos...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> > Beyond that, I don't understand why SQlite is not 3.15.1 ...
>
> Seems to me that SQLite 3.15.1 was released on november the 4th, while
> fossil 1.36 was compiled on october the 24th.
>
> Anyway, I cannot find checksums for 1.36 here
> <http://www.hwaci.com/fossil_download_checksums.html>.
>
> Luca
>
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-users mailing list
> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-users mailing list
> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to