On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote:

> And in any event, I don't think centralization is a factor here.
> Fossil is better positioned than Git or Mercurial to transition to a
> different hash algorithm because the Fossil implementation uses a
> relational database as its backing store.  Git and Hg, in contrast,
> both use bespoke pile-of-files database formats which, I suspect, will
> be more difficult to adapt.
>

just FYI, Linus' own words on the topic, posted yesterday:

https://plus.google.com/u/0/+LinusTorvalds/posts/7tp2gYWQugL

-- 
----- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
"Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of
those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to