On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote:
> And in any event, I don't think centralization is a factor here. > Fossil is better positioned than Git or Mercurial to transition to a > different hash algorithm because the Fossil implementation uses a > relational database as its backing store. Git and Hg, in contrast, > both use bespoke pile-of-files database formats which, I suspect, will > be more difficult to adapt. > just FYI, Linus' own words on the topic, posted yesterday: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+LinusTorvalds/posts/7tp2gYWQugL -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users