On 2/26/17, Ron Aaron <r...@aaron-tech.com> wrote: > > From a performance standpoint, I would rather see Fossil adopt the > BLAKE2 hash, as it is one of the fastest of the SHA3 finalists, and has > adjustable output hash size. >
Please write and check-in code (on the "fossil-2.0" branch) that implements BLAKE2 in a manner analogous to the code in sha1.c and sha3.c. I suggest a new file named "blake2.c". I will then make it an option. What hash length do you want for BLAKE2? Please make the hash length for Fossil-BLAKE2 be a multiple of 8 bits and different from 160, 228, and 256 as those values are already assigned to other hashes. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
