On Aug 15, 2017 11:49, "Stephan Beal" <sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@bec.de> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 08:18:08PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: > > Stamping that version would change the hash. To the best of my knowledge > > that feature cannot be implemented with DVCS (which requires hashing > > (non-serial IDs) for versioning). > > It can be done, just replace the keyword expansion with a canonical form > whenever hashing the content. Keeping the original hash and the hash of > the expanded form allows faster working copy modification checks. > You're to blame when that feature request arrives ;). I'm not following the process. Fossil guarantees hash fidelity - explain differently how this would work and be coherent w/i fossil? -bch -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
