On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 2:47 AM Sébastien Wilmet <swil...@gnome.org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 10:47:16PM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > > Thanks for reminding me of the old days :-) > > > > Various people did that in the past: > > > > > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/1999-July/msg00021.html > > > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/2001-April/msg00034.html > > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-list/2002-April/msg00068.html > > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-list/2004-March/msg00017.html > > > > I think that last one is the last that was sent, but not really sure. > > More recently, Frédéric Péters wrote the commit digests: > https://blogs.gnome.org/commitdigest/ > > With statistics. I think statistics are great and is a source of > motivation when we are listed, and it can be automated (like sending a > mail to desktop-devel-list each week). > I'm okay with sending out metrics, but they need to have a purpose. Basically, what do we do with these metrics and what goal do they drive? When we did GNOME summaries, we also tried to do some interpretation and some observations as part of the metrics. Otherwise, they get sent out and they get wholly ignored as noise. I don't want people people taking the trouble information. Some things to think about. Again, I'm happy to mentor people who are interested in doing this as I've been thinking about this for awhile at least from an onboarding perspective. sri > > -- > Sébastien > _______________________________________________ > foundation-list mailing list > foundation-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list >
_______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
