On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Sergei Gorelkin
<[email protected]> wrote:
> OTOH, if we go for breaking user's code, then it is much better to drop SAX
> altogether and switch over to TXMLTextReader.
> From these points of view the best way is probably to document
> TXMLTextReader, deprecate SAX and leave it alone.
Seems to be the best alternative.
On other topic, a new StaX[1] class, using TXMLTextReader, seems need
not too many work to accomplish. Am I sub estimating It ?
Daniel
[1] http://www.vogella.com/tutorials/JavaXML/article.html#javastax
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
