Am 14.12.2016 10:00 schrieb "Maciej Izak" <hnb.c...@gmail.com>: > > 2016-12-14 0:16 GMT+01:00 Sven Barth <pascaldra...@googlemail.com>: >> >> At least the patch as is (with PPointer) didn't trigger anything on Win64... > > Will it stay as PPointer (PPRecInitTable)? I am wondering why we have bug (or expected behavior?) for this.
It should be a Pointer of course, not a PPointer... I will correct that later on (I shouldn't commit code that late -.- ). >> >> Committed with a few adjustments. Now I only need to update User Changes Trunk, but I'll do that tomorrow *yawns* > > Thanks... Now I need to merge "few adjustments" into NewPascal -,-' :P > Shall we increase CurrentPPUVersion or we will wait some time (we have many changes pending so probably inc for CurrentPPUVersion has not much sense yet)? PPU version is only increased if the structure of the PPU file is changed. That RTTI change has nothing to do with the PPU. Regards, Sven
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel