Am 13.04.2017 23:54 schrieb "gabor" <ga...@poczta.onet.pl>: > > > > W dniu 2017-04-13 o 22:27, Sven Barth via fpc-devel pisze: > >> And it's not about saving RAM or disk memory! It's about *binary code >> reuse*, the ability to fix a bug in multiple executables by merely >> fixing the one bug in a package. > > > Should not all packages depend on the "fixed" package also be recompiled in this case?
As long as the fix is only in the implementation then you don't (except for inline routines). Regards, Sven
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel