Op 19-06-17 om 10:56 schreef Marco van de Voort:
I'm hesitating about merging all fpmkunit and fppkg changes. Things
improved a lot, but a little bit more testing could be useful. Not that
it's used a lot, though.
At least it should handle https, since idefix is https only, now.
What do you think?
We could have take the risk just after a release, so we had some months for
problems to emerge. Last minute merge of 118 revs that are not regularly tested
in trunk is a bit minor. Moreover fpmkunit is heavily used due to fpmake,
and merging is a pain, since support for newer targets that don't exist in
fixes might need manual adjusting.
So I would guess try to name hotfixes only.
That is a bit unfair, since I do merge fcl-passrc atm, but that package is
currently quite used heavily in trunk, and I kept up with merging every 2
months or so without reported problems.
No probem, I can live with that. It's clear this way.
Also, the changes are only stable for about a few weeks. Merging it
earlier was not really an option.
I'll see if I can make a list with hotfixes. Which will be a pain to
merge, as the code in which the fixes are done might even not exist anymore.
But I think we have to change http into https in a few places...
Regards,
Joost.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel