Op 19-06-17 om 10:56 schreef Marco van de Voort:
I'm hesitating about merging all fpmkunit and fppkg changes. Things
improved a lot, but a little bit more testing could be useful. Not that
it's used a lot, though.

At least it should handle https, since idefix is https only, now.

What do you think?
We could have take the risk just after a release, so we had some months for
problems to emerge. Last minute merge of 118 revs that are not regularly tested
in trunk is a bit minor. Moreover fpmkunit is heavily used due to fpmake,
and merging is a pain, since support for newer targets that don't exist in
fixes might need manual adjusting.

So I would guess try to name hotfixes only.

That is a bit unfair, since I do merge fcl-passrc atm, but that package is
currently quite used heavily in trunk, and I kept up with merging every 2
months or so without reported problems.

No probem, I can live with that. It's clear this way.

Also, the changes are only stable for about a few weeks. Merging it earlier was not really an option.

I'll see if I can make a list with hotfixes. Which will be a pain to merge, as the code in which the fixes are done might even not exist anymore.

But I think we have to change http into https in a few places...

Regards,

Joost.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to