On 2017-03-16 05:46, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2017-03-11 23:23, Daniel Gaspary wrote:
WebAssembly
<https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/software/mozilla-releases-firefox-52-the-first-browser-to-support-webassembly/>")

I love how they say multiple times in the video:

   "... and completely secure."


Umm, didn't they say the exact same thing about Java Applets, Flash,
Silverlight etc. :)  I guess time will tell, but if history is anything
to go buy, security issues *will* pop up.

Saying all that, I really respect Mozilla for what they have done
regarding the web. Firefox is the only browser I ever use.

There is no such thing as completely secure.

Most security these days is held together by a single 8-12 character string of text. That's not security.

And, those obsessed with security (OpenBSD types) are the biggest hypocrites of all, claiming to value privacy and security, while completely ignoring security and privacy of people - stalking them and harassing them.

Security is a joke. Let's hold together all our data by a 8-12 character string! Yippee! That's security! Security always has been a joke and always will be. You could create a system where it requires 3562 passwords to log in, in sequence, but then it would take too long to log in.

Website security is to use static html files and a static site generator. Which renders your website basically utterly castrated and un-interactive for the users. Think: no web forum, as there are no logins.. just a static site with static html content. That's security for you: rendering computers utterly useless and boring. Basically describes the openbsd operating by default: a castrated OS that does nothing useful, until you install something unsecure (or worse, "insecure") from "ports" or some website.

I'm not saying the attempts at trying to solve security weren't (or aren't) worthwhile - anyone who heads down this road of security is a brave soul. It's just that time after time again, security has been and will always be a bad joke.

Then you've got the whole quantum computer issue. First guy to get ahold of a quantum computer may be able to crack passwords in a few milliseconds which a classic computer would take thousands of years to do, if the quantum computer hype holds up and we actually understand quantum mechanics the way we think we do. And then, what happens to bitcoin if someone cracks it and starts hording up millions of bitcoins across several accounts.
_______________________________________________
fpc-other maillist  -  fpc-other@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-other

Reply via email to