S4mmael
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:17:20 -0700
> Since the article says that they left the debugging features on I think > this has a bit to do with it. Obviously the testers didn't care to read the > documentation, and didn't seem to care to use the same compiler which is > available in ports, I believe it is safe to chuck this lame benchmark. What about FreeBSD 7.2? All debug featureas are 100% off in this version, but test results are the same as in 8.0 Besides, UFS is known to be not the fastest FS. So, there is no reason to be suprised. _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
- Re: FreeBSD vs Ubuntu - Discuss... Francisco Cabrita
- Re: FreeBSD vs Ubuntu - Discuss... Attilio Rao
- Re: FreeBSD vs Ubuntu - Discuss... István
- Re: FreeBSD vs Ubuntu - Discuss... Attilio Rao
- Re: FreeBSD vs Ubuntu - Discuss... O. Hartmann
- Re: FreeBSD vs Ubuntu - Discuss... Attilio Rao
- Re: FreeBSD vs Ubuntu - Discuss... István
- Re: FreeBSD vs Ubuntu - Discuss... Kip Macy
- Re: FreeBSD vs Ubuntu - Discuss... István
- Re: FreeBSD vs Ubuntu - Discuss... O. Hartmann
Fwd: FreeBSD vs Ubuntu - Discuss... S4mmael
- Re: FreeBSD vs Ubuntu - Discuss... István
- Re: FreeBSD vs Ubuntu - Discuss... Martin MATO
- Re: FreeBSD vs Ubuntu - Discuss... O. Hartmann