Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3

[Jo Rhett]

On Jun 7, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Garance A Drosehn wrote:
The fact that we reject your request that we provide further support
for 6.2 does not mean we did not understand the question.  It is you
who are not understanding the reply.

At the very least, I phrased my question badly.  Because I asked "why"  
and I heard "no".  And "no" is not an answer to "why".  I still  
haven't heard the why.

What you are asking for is *SUPPORT* for 6.2.  That implies that we

No, I never asked for that.  Depending on the answer to "why" I was  
going to decide what my choices were for helping out and improving the  
situation in some form.  Without the "why" I haven't the foggiest idea  
how to help.  (for already well known bugs which don't need my time/ 
effort/attention)

--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source  
and other randomness


_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"