Greg Lyons
Tue, 12 Aug 2003 04:07:28 +0200
Um, never mind about the 1.1.6 beta. Use 1.2.0 instead! (Thanks Andreas!)
On Monday 11 August 2003 20:45, you wrote: > In terms of security, ftp.proxy seems to be pretty decent. The I/O is > somewhat isolated, so things like buffer overflows should come up much less > frequently than some other software I've looked into. In practice, I've > been running ftp.proxy as an outbound-only proxy at my company (40,000+ > employees) for over a year with no incidents. > > The consensus among the group seems to be to use the 1.1.6 beta. It's > fairly stable code (it is, as you observed, a slow-moving project). Mostly > bugfixes in the beta, not a lot of new functionality. > > The list may not be "active", but certainly not dead. "Slow-moving" maybe. > Fits the project. :-) > > On Thursday 07 August 2003 10:46, you wrote: > > I've just gotten interested in this project, and was wondering if there > > are archives for the two mailing lists, so I don't ask things that were > > recently discussed. > > > > Since I'm trying to get my company to start using this proxy, questions > > are coming up about security. Anyone have any opinions or references as > > to how "secure" it might be? > > > > I made changes so 1.1.5 compiles on Solaris, though I'm curious what > > features I should wait for in 1.1.6 (or just use the beta?) > > > > Just wondering if this is an active list. It seems like a slow-moving > > project, at least. (but how much does an FTP proxy really have to do, > > after all?) > > > > philipp hanes > > > > > > --general-l------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe please visit: > > http://www.ftpproxy.org/html/maillinglists.html > > --general-l------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe please visit: > http://www.ftpproxy.org/html/maillinglists.html --general-l------------------------------------ To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.ftpproxy.org/html/maillinglists.html