On 24 January 2012 00:28, Shaika-Dzari <shaikadz...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Harry portobello > <harryportobe...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> why? i still dont understnad what happens to fvwm when you leave? i >> think it will be better off, no? because then other developers can >> concentrate on adding features they want without you removing them or >> being anal about things, >> >> Harry >> > > Ok, now it's enough. > Harry, you're not happy ? > This is open source software , fork fwvm and let us see how you will > write and manage this code base. > > What did you contribute ? Nothing. > Which one did you help ? No one.
we have lots of patches like adding round corners and fluxbox handels which have not been added to fvwm in long time - and why is this? why isnt the maintainer - thomas - adding these? ive been asking for them before and i think i read other people want them too so a new maintainer should listen more to this i hope Harry
