Becky
Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:25:47 -0800
I'm sure we're all familiar with the phenomenon of "Code Bloating", where when an Application Program or Operating System goes through a major revision, the length of it's source and/or executable code gets larger with each revision. (Ever heard of Microsoft?) The end result with "Code Bloating" is that each version requires more and more hardware/horsepower in order to run at the same apparent speed as the previous version did on its own hardware. I've sort of (and I emphasis SORT OF) been told that this is not true between at least two versions of OS X. Can anyone verify this in any way? In other words:
- Given the same obsolete hardware (and the XPostFacto software add-on):
-- Is 10.2 faster or slower than 10.3? -- Is 10.3 faster or slower than 10.4? -- Is 10.2 faster or slower than 10.4? Thanks much, LPp.s.: I assume that all of you already know about it, but just-in-case, here's a link for XPostFacto:
http://eshop.macsales.com/OSXCenter/XPostFacto/Framework.cfm?page=XPostFacto.html . -- G-Books is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives | -- Check our web site for refurbished PowerBooks | & CDRWs on Sale! | Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> G-Books list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-books.html> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:" Send list messages to: <mailto:G-Books@mail.maclaunch.com> To unsubscribe, email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/g-books%40mail.maclaunch.com/> --------------------------------------------------------------- iPod Accessories for Less at 1-800-iPOD.COM Fast Delivery, Low Price, Good Deal www.1800ipod.com ---------------------------------------------------------------