I frequently wonder why otherwise competent scholars come up with statements 
like this 
one:

---
Although chemical analysis indicated that several cave jars were made from clay 
found near 
Qumran, it also showed material from five other locations, suggesting that the 
scrolls might 
have originated in many different sites.
---

How?  All it suggests is that the JARS might have originated in many different 
sites.  It says 
nothing at all about the scrolls therein.  

Dave Washburn
"Bash the ground until bananas come out."
_______________________________________________
g-Megillot mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.McMaster.CA/mailman/listinfo/g-megillot

Reply via email to