> The essences of what I am getting at here is you have an open source > project that is really cool, works well on most platforms. Someone comes > along and develops some code that is leveraged by this open project, but > is not open itself. Is this an "ok thing"? To me it seems legal, but > smells.
i think it's great that commercial companies are realizing it's better to play nicely with the open-source community than to go the closed, proprietary route. the protocol.x file was distributed with the source for exactly that reason: to make it easy to write clients and services that talk on ganglia channels. -- matt massie phone: 415.692.0828 x2843 fax: 415.278.0441 http://archrock.com/
