gay_bombay  

g_b Exodus International President acknowledges failure of Ex-Gay "change" efforts

Aditya Bondyopadhyay
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:37:12 -0800

http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/01/09/40435
Ex-Gay Leader: “99.9% Have Not Experienced A Change In Their Orientation”Jim
BurrowayJanuary 9th, 2012

Last Friday, Exodus International President Alan Chambers appeared on a
surprise panel Friday night at the Gay Christian Network’s annual
conference on Orlando with former ex-gay leader Jeremy Marks, Exodus critic
and ex-gay bridge-builder Wendy Gritter, and former Love In Action
executive director John Smid. The panel was announced with little notice on
Friday, catching many ex-gay survivors at the conference off-guard. GCN has
posted audio of that panel discussion (Part
1<http://www.gaychristian.net/audio/2012conversation_pt1.mp3>
, part 
2<http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gaychristian.net%2Faudio%2F2012conversation_pt2.mp3&h=FAQFiRmmJAQG3Bg0yAoKtGG9ezqUQsgAGY-X3760VgJ-o6A>).
In the opening minutes of part 2, Chambers addresses the criticism that
Exodus and other ex-gay ministries promise change in sexual orientation:

I think it’s a fair criticism from the past. If there are member ministries
today that are promising something that I’m not aware that they’re
promising, I’d want to know some specifics. I hear a lot of generalities,
but I value specifics. And that’s something that does concern me because
the fact of the matter is, and I feel like I’ve been very upfront and
clear, both in the media, at conferences, anytime I have the opportunity to
write about it, about the fact that I believe the slogan “Change is
Possible,” for those of us who are Christians we do understand that when
you come into a relationship with Christ all sorts of things are possible.

The majority of people that I have met, and I would say the majority
meaning 99.9% of them, have not experienced a change in their orientation
or have gotten to a place where they could say that they could never be
tempted or are not tempted in some way or experience some level of same-sex
attraction. I think there is a gender issue there, there are some women who
have challenged me and said that my orientation or my attractions have
changed completely. Those have been few and far between. The vast majority
of people that I know do still experience some level of same-sex attraction.

And so that’s something, I think, I can’t be any clearer about that. …I
hope that we’re coming to a place where we are a much more honest group of
people, that when we talk about “Change is Possible,” we are very, very
clear about what change means in our lives.

Last November, there were reports that Chambers was considering a
modification of their
message<http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/11/30/39229>.
At that time, I noted that Exodus has flirted with the idea of retooling
its message before. The main message from Exodus has centered on changing
from homosexuality to heterosexuality (however loosely defined that change
may be). But there has been an underlying theme “the opposite of
homosexuality isn’t heterosexuality, it’s holiness,” which leaves open the
idea that becoming straight isn’t the goal. Chambers has been giving
variations on that theme since at least
2007<http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/08/02/603>.
He surprised supporters and critics alike in 2009 when he told the *Los
Angeles Times* <http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/06/22/469>, “By no
means would we ever say change can be sudden or complete.”

It’s unclear whether this is a further tweaking of that theme or if it
represents a marked change in message for the organization. So far, it
looks more like a clarification similar to others that he has made when
pressed about what change means. The only difference this time is his
admission that “99.9%” don’t change. It will be interesting to see is if
Chambers repeats his past pattern of clarifying his remarks in ways that
bring them closer to more orthodox ex-gay messages. After all, If it does
represent a marked change in message for Exodus International, it remains
to be seen how this change would go down among the mostly-Evangelical
churches which provide the bulk of financial support for Exodus
International.

A concurrent story to Chambers’s appearance at GCN is the controversy that
surrounded the surprise panel at the conference. A very large number of GCN
members are ex-gay survivors, and many of them felt blindsided by the
conference. According to some of them who took to Facebook and Twitter to
vent their anger, many of them first found out about the panel not form GCN
but from a post earlier that day at Ex-Gay
Watch<http://www.exgaywatch.com/wp/2012/01/exodus-president-alan-chambers-to-appear-at-gcn-conference-tonight/>.
No ex-gay survivors were part of the panel discussion to provide
counterpoint to Chambers’s presence, a move which strikes this writer as
reminiscent of examples in history where conferences and panels discussed
the issues surrounding homosexuality as a mental illness without the
participation of a single gay person.

GCN Executive Director Justin Lee spent the first fifteen minutes of the
panel discussion addressing the controversy, incorrectly identifying XGW as
among those who called him “naive” for hosting the panel discussion. He
described the panel as an optional event, and urged those who didn’t feel
comfortable remaining in the room to excuse themselves and attend an
alternative event for ex-gay survivors. Insiders and social media
commenters, some of whom say they are undergoing counseling for PTSD and
other disorders as a result of having been part of an ex-gay ministry,
complain that the alternative event was hastily organized by survivors
themselves at the last minute after GCN failed to organize an alternative
to the panel. Lee addressed the controversy this way:

I believe in seeing people’s humanity. I believe even in the midst of
strong disagreement in saying you are my brother, you are my sister in
Christ. I want to understand you. I want to understand where you’re coming
from no matter how much I disagree with you because you’re a human being
and God loves you. And I want to love you too even though I disagree with
you. That’s important to me. That’s part of what I do.

…One part of me is I want to look at the world from Alan’s perspective and
I want to say Alan I respect you as my brother, I respect what you’re
trying to do what you think is right even though I disagree with you, and I
love you because God loves you, and have this “kumbaya” moment. And there’s
another part of me that’s like I’m really, really angry about a lot of
things that have happened in Exodus and other ex-gay ministries.


On 10 January 2012 10:11, RON SCHLITTLER <rlschlitt...@verizon.net> wrote:

> Hello Everyone,
>
> Here are two items that will likely be of particular interest to those
> around the world working to challenge “reparative therapy” promotion
> discourses.
>
> The first is a rather stunning 
> admission<http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/01/09/40435>by Exodus 
> International President Alan Chambers.  While on a panel at a
> conference of people recovering from the damage of ex-gay therapies, he
> said, “The majority of people that I have met, and I would say the majority
> meaning 99.9% of them, have not experienced a change in their orientation
> or have gotten to a place where they could say that they could never be
> tempted or are not tempted in some way or experience some level of same-sex
> attraction.”
>
> The second is something I ran across while investigating coverage of the
> news of Chambers' statement:  “*WORLD Magazine <http://www.worldmag.com/>* has
> named Exodus International President Alan Chambers as its "Daniel of the
> Year,"<http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2011/December/Exodus-Intl-Head-Named-Daniel-of-the-Year/>a
>  title that honors Christians who stand up to ungodly trends.”
>
> It will be interesting to see if/how his new revelation will play among
> such press sources that consider him a primary advocate and spokesperson on
> the topic.
>
> Ron
>
> _______________________________________________
> sogi-list mailing list
> sogi-l...@arc-international.net
> http://lists.arc-international.net/mailman/listinfo/sogi-list
>
>


-- 
-- 
ADITYA BONDYOPADHYAY
Development Sector Consultant
Advocate (Regd. No. F-218/192 of 1997, Bar Council of W.Bengal, India)

Website: http://adityabondyopadhyay.webs.com/
================================
Notice to all recipients:
Communication not intended for you but reaching you inadvertently needs to
be treated as confidential and destroyed or deleted immediately. Use of
such communication in a manner prejudicial to the interest of Aditya
Bondyopadhyay and/or his principals, and/or his clients, and/or his agents
respectively, may attract legal proceedings which may be of a civil or
criminal nature.

Aditya Bondyopadhyay and/or his principals, and/or his clients, and/or his
agents respectively cannot be held liable or accountable for any and every
communication reaching out through this email account that is an unaltered
forward of another communication received by this email account, or a
referred source available on the internet and accessible to the public.
  • g_b Exodus International President acknowledges failure of Ex-Gay "change" efforts Aditya Bondyopadhyay