gcc

Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:02:59 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Russ Allbery

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:58:38 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Paweł Sikora

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:42:12 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Andrew Haley

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:37:11 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Joseph S. Myers

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:31:57 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Paweł Sikora

Re: Combine misses commutativity

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:25:55 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Paulo J. Matos

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:23:37 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Joseph S. Myers

Combine misses commutativity

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:58:16 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Paulo J. Matos

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:26:15 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Geert Bosch

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:23:46 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Geert Bosch

Re: GCC GCOV

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:00:18 GMT

2012/02/10 -- David Malcolm

[pph] Merge from trunk

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:27:28 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Diego Novillo

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:55:13 GMT

2012/02/10 -- James Courtier-Dutton

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:36:48 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Andrew Haley

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:25:17 GMT

2012/02/10 -- James Courtier-Dutton

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:05:48 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Andrew Haley

Documenting libm function errors

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:01:32 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Joseph S. Myers

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:50:37 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Joseph S. Myers

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:30:47 GMT

2012/02/10 -- James Courtier-Dutton

register used as both FP and GP register when -Os switch used

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:35:20 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Paul S

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:43:40 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Andrew Haley

Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:42:29 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Andrew Haley

Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:15:52 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Andreas Schwab

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:07:56 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Richard Guenther

Re: Announcing new docstring relicensing maintainers

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:16:59 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Joseph S. Myers

Re: Graphite news

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:27:58 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Tobias Grosser

Announcing new docstring relicensing maintainers

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:21:47 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Marc Lehmann

Re: Graphite news

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:59:08 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Vladimir Makarov

GCC GCOV

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:53:07 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Satya Prakash Prasad

Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:14:15 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Russ Allbery

Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:06:55 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Ian Lance Taylor

Re: Graphite news

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:54:44 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Tobias Grosser

gcc-4.5-20120209 is now available

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:49:37 GMT

2012/02/09 -- gccadmin

Re: Graphite news

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:37:53 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Tobias Grosser

register used as both FP and GP register when -Os switch used

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:35:14 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Paul S

Re: Graphite news

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:05:52 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Vladimir Makarov

Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:56:38 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Russ Allbery

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:33:52 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Joseph S. Myers

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:24:00 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Joseph S. Myers

Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:26:25 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Toon Moene

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:17:05 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Geert Bosch

Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:16:35 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Arnaud Charlet

Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:13:46 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Matthias Klose

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:09:16 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Andrew Haley

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:01:04 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Joseph S. Myers

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:56:14 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Joseph S. Myers

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:43:21 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Andrew Haley

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:36:29 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Geert Bosch

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:19:04 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Joseph S. Myers

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:53:57 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Joseph S. Myers

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:16:59 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Michael Matz

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:14:09 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Michael Matz

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:02:34 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Andrew Haley

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:00:24 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Richard Guenther

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:59:38 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Andrew Haley

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:58:15 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Andrew Haley

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:57:15 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Michael Matz

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:56:06 GMT

2012/02/09 -- James Courtier-Dutton

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:50:30 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Andrew Haley

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:28:17 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Richard Guenther

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:20:35 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Geert Bosch

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:15:43 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Andrew Haley

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:51:39 GMT

2012/02/09 -- James Courtier-Dutton

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:46:52 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Andrew Haley

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:39:41 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Tim Prince

Graphite news

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:42:46 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Tobias Grosser

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:55:34 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Richard Guenther

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:36:00 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Andrew Haley

Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:33:35 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Richard Guenther

Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:21:11 GMT

2012/02/09 -- James Courtier-Dutton

Re: Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:34:04 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Ian Lance Taylor

Building gcc on Ubuntu 11.10

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:16:42 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Nenad Vukicevic

Re: [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:35:44 GMT

2012/02/08 -- Andrew MacLeod

Re: [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:19:10 GMT

2012/02/08 -- Gerald Pfeifer

Re: [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:45:28 GMT

2012/02/08 -- Jonathan Wakely

Re: [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:50:30 GMT

2012/02/08 -- Andrew MacLeod

Re: [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:31:26 GMT

2012/02/08 -- Jonathan Wakely

[PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:03:56 GMT

2012/02/08 -- Andrew MacLeod

Re: spill failure after IF-CASE-2 transformation

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:59:34 GMT

2012/02/08 -- Bernd Schmidt

Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:51:50 GMT

2012/02/08 -- Andrew MacLeod

Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:44:55 GMT

2012/02/08 -- Andrew MacLeod

Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:39:27 GMT

2012/02/08 -- Andrew MacLeod

Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:23:35 GMT

2012/02/08 -- Jonathan Wakely

Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:06:24 GMT

2012/02/08 -- Andrew MacLeod

Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:54:58 GMT

2012/02/08 -- Richard Guenther

New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:00:08 GMT

2012/02/08 -- Jonathan Wakely

gcc-4.4-20120207 is now available

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:42:29 GMT

2012/02/07 -- gccadmin

Re: approaches to carry-flag modelling in RTL

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:14:39 GMT

2012/02/07 -- Hans-Peter Nilsson

Re: da.po.diff

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:51:22 GMT

2012/02/07 -- Ian Lance Taylor

Re: Template Handling in G++

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:49:18 GMT

2012/02/07 -- Ian Lance Taylor

spill failure after IF-CASE-2 transformation

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:43:20 GMT

2012/02/07 -- Henderson, Stuart

Re: lto pseudo-object files and fixed registers

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:34:10 GMT

2012/02/07 -- Andrew Pinski

Re: lto pseudo-object files and fixed registers

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:28:17 GMT

2012/02/07 -- Andi Kleen

Re: Problem with inline member functions

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:22:37 GMT

2012/02/07 -- Jonathan Wakely

Re: [trans-mem,libitm] brief report on known bugs

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:06:10 GMT

2012/02/07 -- Aldy Hernandez

[trans-mem,libitm] brief report on known bugs

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:41:07 GMT

2012/02/07 -- Patrick Marlier

Re: question on bitmap_set_subtract unction in pre

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:09:48 GMT

2012/02/07 -- Richard Guenther

Problem with inline member functions

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:57:33 GMT

2012/02/07 -- Alexandre Almeida

Re: lto pseudo-object files and fixed registers

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:32:15 GMT

2012/02/07 -- Konstantin Vladimirov

Re: question on bitmap_set_subtract unction in pre

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:31:30 GMT

2012/02/07 -- Amker.Cheng