gcc  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Bug in Tree to RTL expansion? Richard Guenther
  • RE: Bug in Tree to RTL expansion? Bingfeng Mei
  • RE: Bug in Tree to RTL expansion? Bingfeng Mei
• How could I cast the return type of a function created by gimple_build_call? Feng LI
  • Re: How could I cast the return type of a function created by gimple_build_call? Martin Jambor
  • Re: How could I cast the return type of a function created by gimple_build_call? Richard Guenther
• Failure to bootstrap current gcc trunk on cygwin (20111207 snapshot): conflicting declarations in cygwin's /usr/include/sys/wait.h Christian Joensson
  • Re: Failure to bootstrap current gcc trunk on cygwin (20111207 snapshot): conflicting declarations in cygwin's /usr/include/sys/wait.h Dave Korn
  • Re: Failure to bootstrap current gcc trunk on cygwin (20111207 snapshot): conflicting declarations in cygwin's /usr/include/sys/wait.h Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: Failure to bootstrap current gcc trunk on cygwin (20111207 snapshot): conflicting declarations in cygwin's /usr/include/sys/wait.h Ian Lance Taylor
  • Re: Failure to bootstrap current gcc trunk on cygwin (20111207 snapshot): conflicting declarations in cygwin's /usr/include/sys/wait.h Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: Failure to bootstrap current gcc trunk on cygwin (20111207 snapshot): conflicting declarations in cygwin's /usr/include/sys/wait.h Christian Joensson
• Call for Papers: Environmental Management & Technologies Conference! Environmental Management & Technologies Working Group
• gcc-4.4-20111206 is now available gccadmin
• gcc 4.6.2 hangs while building glibc 2.14 Joel Reymont
  • Re: gcc 4.6.2 hangs while building glibc 2.14 Joel Reymont
• RFC - GCC Architectural Goals Diego Novillo
  • Re: RFC - GCC Architectural Goals Basile Starynkevitch
  • Re: RFC - GCC Architectural Goals Gabriel Dos Reis
  • Re: RFC - GCC Architectural Goals Diego Novillo
  • Re: RFC - GCC Architectural Goals 陳韋任
  • Re: RFC - GCC Architectural Goals Diego Novillo
  • Re: RFC - GCC Architectural Goals 陳韋任
  • Re: RFC - GCC Architectural Goals Diego Novillo
  • Re: RFC - GCC Architectural Goals Dodji Seketeli
  • Re: RFC - GCC Architectural Goals Diego Novillo
  • Re: RFC - GCC Architectural Goals Gerald Pfeifer
  • Re: RFC - GCC Architectural Goals Quentin Neill
  • Re: RFC - GCC Architectural Goals Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: RFC - GCC Architectural Goals Quentin Neill
  • Re: RFC - GCC Architectural Goals Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: RFC - GCC Architectural Goals Joseph S. Myers
• crtbegin not building? Lawrence Crowl
  • Re: crtbegin not building? Ian Lance Taylor
  • Re: crtbegin not building? Diego Novillo
• Perfect forwarding seems not to be so perfect Piotr Wyderski
  • Re: Perfect forwarding seems not to be so perfect Paolo Carlini
  • Re: Perfect forwarding seems not to be so perfect Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: Perfect forwarding seems not to be so perfect Jonathan Wakely
• Notification about the rejected Direct Deposit payment Mike Anthony
• GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-12-06) Joseph S. Myers
  • Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-12-06) Gary Funck
  • Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-12-06) Joseph S. Myers
• building unwind-sjlj.o with / without -fexceptions Joern Rennecke
  • Re: building unwind-sjlj.o with / without -fexceptions Richard Henderson
  • Re: building unwind-sjlj.o with / without -fexceptions Joern Rennecke
  • Re: building unwind-sjlj.o with / without -fexceptions Kai Tietz
  • Re: building unwind-sjlj.o with / without -fexceptions Richard Henderson
  • Re: building unwind-sjlj.o with / without -fexceptions Hans-Peter Nilsson
• Broken link Marco Antonio Gómez Martín
  • Re: Broken link Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: Broken link Jonathan Wakely
• gcc-4.7-20111203 is now available gccadmin
• Is ada's "make install" parallel-safe? Dave Korn
  • Re: Is ada's "make install" parallel-safe? Dave Korn
• libsupc++/exception cannot find bits/atomic_lockfree_defines.h Diego Novillo
  • Re: libsupc++/exception cannot find bits/atomic_lockfree_defines.h Andrew MacLeod
  • Re: libsupc++/exception cannot find bits/atomic_lockfree_defines.h Diego Novillo
• gcc-4.6-20111202 is now available gccadmin
• MELT plugin 0.9.2 rc1 for GCC 4.6 (& future 4.7) available Basile Starynkevitch
  • MELT plugin 0.9.2 rc2 for GCC 4.6 (& future 4.7) available Basile Starynkevitch
  • MELT plugin 0.9.2 for GCC 4.6 (& future 4.7) available Basile Starynkevitch
  • Re: MELT plugin 0.9.2.b for GCC 4.6 (& future 4.7) available Basile Starynkevitch
• C++: rvalue references for *this Hans Aberg
  • Re: C++: rvalue references for *this Paolo Carlini
  • Re: C++: rvalue references for *this Bronek Kozicki
  • Re: C++: rvalue references for *this Hans Aberg
• Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection Patrice Bouchand
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection Patrice B
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection Jeff Law
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection David Brown
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection Patrice B
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection Ian Lance Taylor
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection Jeff Law
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection Andrew Pinski
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection David Brown
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection Jeff Law
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection Robert Dewar
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection Tom Tromey
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection David Brown
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection Robert Dewar
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection Miles Bader
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection Ian Lance Taylor
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection Dave Korn
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection Richard Guenther
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection David Brown
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection Robert Dewar
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection David Brown
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection Robert Dewar
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection Richard Kenner
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection Robert Dewar
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection David Brown
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection David Brown
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection David Malcolm
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection Ruben Safir
  • Re: Suspicion of regression in uninitialized value detection Jeff Law
• Dimensions of array parameters Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Dimensions of array parameters Joseph S. Myers
  • Re: Dimensions of array parameters Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Dimensions of array parameters Joseph S. Myers
  • Re: Dimensions of array parameters Ian Lance Taylor
  • Re: Dimensions of array parameters Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Dimensions of array parameters Ian Lance Taylor
  • Re: Dimensions of array parameters Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Dimensions of array parameters Ian Lance Taylor
  • Re: Dimensions of array parameters Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Dimensions of array parameters Ian Lance Taylor
  • Re: Dimensions of array parameters Joseph S. Myers
• Creating a structure at compile time. Matt Davis
  • Re: Creating a structure at compile time. Matt Davis
  • Re: Creating a structure at compile time. Ian Lance Taylor
• Simplification of relational operations (was [patch for PR18942]) Maxim Kuvyrkov
  • Re: Simplification of relational operations (was [patch for PR18942]) Zdenek Dvorak
  • Re: Simplification of relational operations (was [patch for PR18942]) Jakub Jelinek
  • Re: Simplification of relational operations (was [patch for PR18942]) Maxim Kuvyrkov
• gcc-4.5-20111201 is now available gccadmin
• Parallel build error Richard Henderson
• Warning for functions called before declared inline Steven Bosscher
  • Re: Warning for functions called before declared inline Joseph S. Myers
  • Re: Warning for functions called before declared inline Steven Bosscher
  • Re: Warning for functions called before declared inline Joseph S. Myers
  • Re: Warning for functions called before declared inline Eric Botcazou
• Working with frontend-specific aspects of GCC from a GCC plugin David Malcolm
  • Re: Working with frontend-specific aspects of GCC from a GCC plugin Diego Novillo
  • Re: Working with frontend-specific aspects of GCC from a GCC plugin Jeff Law
  • Re: Working with frontend-specific aspects of GCC from a GCC plugin David Malcolm
  • Re: Working with frontend-specific aspects of GCC from a GCC plugin Tom Tromey
  • Re: Working with frontend-specific aspects of GCC from a GCC plugin Jakub Jelinek
• C++ memory model... What to do with libatomic Andrew MacLeod
  • Re: C++ memory model... What to do with libatomic Richard Henderson
• A new stack protector option? 沈涵
  • Re: A new stack protector option? Ye Joey
  • Re: A new stack protector option? 沈涵
  • Re: A new stack protector option? Jakub Jelinek
  • Re: A new stack protector option? 沈涵
• gcc-4.4-20111129 is now available gccadmin
• ANN: gcc-python-plugin 0.7 David Malcolm
• Bluna.tv Reel 2012 bluna . tv
• volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Ian Lance Taylor
  • Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Ian Lance Taylor
  • Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Ian Lance Taylor
  • Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Richard Guenther
  • RE: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Paul_Koning
  • Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Peter Bigot
  • Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Richard Guenther
  • Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Andrew Haley
  • Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Richard Guenther
  • Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Paul Koning
  • Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Ian Lance Taylor
  • Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Richard Henderson
  • Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Richard Guenther
  • Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Richard Henderson
  • Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Richard Guenther
  • Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Richard Guenther
  • Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md David Brown
  • Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Dave Korn
  • Re: volatile correctness: combine vs. target.md Peter Bigot
• Preserve labels for the life of Compliation Iyer, Balaji V
• Gcc silently transforms a finite loop to an infinite one Nadezhda Ivanоvna Vyukova
  • Re: Gcc silently transforms a finite loop to an infinite one Michael Matz
  • Re: Gcc silently transforms a finite loop to an infinite one Robert Dewar
  • Re: Gcc silently transforms a finite loop to an infinite one Michael Matz
  • Re: Gcc silently transforms a finite loop to an infinite one Ian Lance Taylor
  • Re: Gcc silently transforms a finite loop to an infinite one David Brown
  • Re: Gcc silently transforms a finite loop to an infinite one Joseph S. Myers
  • Re: Gcc silently transforms a finite loop to an infinite one David Brown
  • Re: Gcc silently transforms a finite loop to an infinite one Joseph S. Myers
• gcc-4.7-20111126 is now available gccadmin
• At which pass thing goes wrong for PR43491? Amker.Cheng
  • Re: At which pass thing goes wrong for PR43491? Amker.Cheng
  • Re: At which pass thing goes wrong for PR43491? Richard Guenther
  • Re: At which pass thing goes wrong for PR43491? Amker.Cheng
  • Re: At which pass thing goes wrong for PR43491? Richard Guenther
• error linking lto1 for target avr Sean D'Epagnier
  • Re: error linking lto1 for target avr Wim Lewis
  • Re: error linking lto1 for target avr Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: error linking lto1 for target avr Steven Bosscher
  • Re: error linking lto1 for target avr Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: error linking lto1 for target avr Ian Lance Taylor
  • Re: error linking lto1 for target avr Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: error linking lto1 for target avr Eric Botcazou
  • Re: error linking lto1 for target avr Ian Lance Taylor
  • Re: error linking lto1 for target avr Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: error linking lto1 for target avr Ian Lance Taylor
  • [Patch,AVR] Was/Fix: error linking lto1 for target avr Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: [Patch,AVR] Was/Fix: error linking lto1 for target avr Denis Chertykov
  • Re: [Patch,AVR] Was/Fix: error linking lto1 for target avr Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: [Patch,AVR] Was/Fix: error linking lto1 for target avr Ian Lance Taylor
  • Re: [Patch,AVR] Was/Fix: error linking lto1 for target avr Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: [Patch,AVR] Was/Fix: error linking lto1 for target avr Steven Bosscher
  • Re: [Patch,AVR] Was/Fix: error linking lto1 for target avr Ian Lance Taylor
• gcc-4.6-20111125 is now available gccadmin
• Defining symvers without using asm() Jan Engelhardt
  • Re: Defining symvers without using asm() Ian Lance Taylor

• Earlier messages
• Later messages