yehudah werner
Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:49:22 -0800
Hello, John Rudge is right that Underwoodisaurus milii now is Nephrurus milii. But this is so only because the last publication is what counts, not because it is imposed by the evidence. John considers, and probably rightly, that the strongest evidence is the paper by Melville et al. 2004. But this paper shows "N. milii" to be the sister group of a clade of 4 Nephrurus species, not within that clade. It could retain its separate genus name, Underwoodisaurus Wermuth. The authors only say that given that the genus does no more exist (this they don't say expressly but imply) the species belongs not with Phyllurus as earlier thought (Kluge, Russell) but with Nephrurus. Fine, but why not retain (or revive) Underwoodisaurus, which lacks the distinctive Nephrurus tail, commemorating the deserving gecko researcher Garth Underwood and the deserving gecko author Heinz Wermuth ? Yehudah
Yehudah L. Werner
Professor Emeritus of Zoology
Department of Evolution, Systematics and Ecology
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
91904 Jerusalem, Israel
Tel. 972-2-6585874 (direct)
Fax 972-2-6584741 (departmental office)
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home tel./fax 972-2-5665576
---------------------------------
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.