Martin Nordholts
Mon, 04 Dec 2006 04:42:18 -0800
> On 12/4/06, Øyvind Kolås <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > 2. The term "bounding box" is clearer than "defined region". > >> > *gegl_node_get_bounding_box >> >> The names of the concept internally, and a decision externally >> might be propagated to the inside as well. Another option might be >> gegl_node_get_bounds , or with a naming choice more similar to the >> ones used by cairo, gegl_node_get_extents. > > I've renamed this one to gegl_node_get_bounding_box for now, > I think gegl_node_get_dirty_rect should be renamed to be more similar > to gegl_node_get_bounding_box. I like gegl_node_get_bounding_box gegl_node_get_bounding_box_of_dirt gegl_node_clear_dirt the most. I think dirt is a good word, at least better than uncomputed. It both makes sense and is easier to write. - Martin N. _______________________________________________ Gegl-developer mailing list Gegl-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer