Berin Loritsch
Mon, 16 Jul 2001 09:05:02 -0700
Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On 7/16/01 12:03 PM, "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Jason, > > > > In the long run am ok to using anything to do the docs and site. In the short > > term, let us at > > least stick to the Stylebook DTD's since every other project in the xml family > > are already in this > > format. When we decide to move forward, let us push all the projects to move > > forward. > > I would rather wait until c2 is done, I would rather not use another > format. I am used to the tags of Anakia, but I fully agree with using > standard DocBook tags. I would rather use DocBook tags myself anyway. This > is what c2 will accept, yes? If so I would rather go that route. Stylebook > is in the past for me and I don't want to use it again. > > I think that using DocBook as the input is very wise, and I would like > to get Anakia using DocBook as there are so many tools for DocBook than > at least two apache projects would be using the same format. Geir has > wanted to do this for a while but no time. But if we all used DocBook > than it doesn't really matter what produces the final output. xml.apache.org > can eat its own dogfood, and jakarta.apache.org can do the same. > > I would be happy to try c2 using DocBook. Take a look at http://jakarta.apache.org/avalon/developing/index.xml The whole "Developing with Avalon" book is written in DocBook 4.1 format-- and uses Cocoon to style the site. It is possible. The only shortcomming is autogenerating the Table of Contents (ToC). The approach I used is to embed XInclude statements that link to the different Chapters. Every linked page is an entry for the ToC. Getting the title from the other files was a bit more difficult. I will attempt to try a different approach soon. It is amazing what Apache products can do right now. I haven't created the PDF generation portion yet--but it is only a matter of time.