Fabian Groffen
Fri, 25 May 2007 13:45:07 -0700
On 25-05-2007 22:27:38 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > > Ok, that is vague, but indicates some problem with where prefix-launcher > > gets the compiler from. > > When emerging coreutils with eprefix-bootstrap in stage 'basics', > binutils-2.16.1 and gcc-4.1.2 are already from the new eprefix.
Ohw... ok. > Maybe we should try to not be sticked to binutils-2.16.1 during > bootstrap ? > But wait, prefix-launcher can build binutils-2.17 without texinfo, > although the patch[1] is not applied... > [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.alt/2386 Problem of that patch is that it is not what we want in the main tree for a normal installation of the package. > Btw, I'm bootstrapping an eprefix on sparc-solaris2.9 now too (being one > of the slowest machines here...) I can imagine... I want /var/tmp mountable install stages, so we don't need this hell of getting this crap straight. But I guess for prefix launcher there is no other option then applying the patch and emerging binutils-2.17.* -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list