Michael Haubenwallner
Fri, 25 May 2007 14:33:10 -0700
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 22:44 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 25-05-2007 22:27:38 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: <snip> > > Maybe we should try to not be sticked to binutils-2.16.1 during > > bootstrap ? > > But wait, prefix-launcher can build binutils-2.17 without texinfo, > > although the patch[1] is not applied... > > [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.alt/2386 > > Problem of that patch is that it is not what we want in the main tree > for a normal installation of the package. > > > Btw, I'm bootstrapping an eprefix on sparc-solaris2.9 now too (being one > > of the slowest machines here...) > > I can imagine... > > I want /var/tmp mountable install stages, so we don't need this hell of > getting this crap straight. But I guess for prefix launcher there is no > other option then applying the patch and emerging binutils-2.17.*
Err, prefix-launcher does _not_ apply this patch to binutils-2.17. Maybe in toolchain-binutils.eclass there is some 'touch' missing on texinfo-outputfiles after patching the sources... /haubi/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list