gentoo-dev  

Messages by Thread

• [gentoo-dev] comprehensive eclass checking in repoman Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] comprehensive eclass checking in repoman Kent Fredric
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] comprehensive eclass checking in repoman Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] comprehensive eclass checking in repoman Zac Medico
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] comprehensive eclass checking in repoman Kent Fredric
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] comprehensive eclass checking in repoman Zac Medico
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: comprehensive eclass checking in repoman Steven J Long
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: comprehensive eclass checking in repoman Mike Frysinger
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: comprehensive eclass checking in repoman Ryan Hill
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: comprehensive eclass checking in repoman Ryan Hill
• [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: freebsd.eclass Samuli Suominen
• [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: sys-cluster/lam-mpi Kacper Kowalik
• [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Michael Weber
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Johannes Huber
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Ian Whyman
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Matthew Thode
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Alexey Shvetsov
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Anthony G. Basile
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Rich Freeman
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Andreas K. Huettel
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Aaron W. Swenson
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Fabio Erculiani
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Michael Palimaka
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver justin
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Sergei Trofimovich
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Michał Górny
  • Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Andreas K. Huettel
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Alexey Shvetsov
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Marc Schiffbauer
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Robin H. Johnson
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Alexey Shvetsov
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Robin H. Johnson
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Alexey Shvetsov
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Rich Freeman
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Alexey Shvetsov
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Kent Fredric
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Alexey Shvetsov
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Robin H. Johnson
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Rafael Goncalves Martins
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Arun Raghavan
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Nirbheek Chauhan
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Fabio Erculiani
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver hasufell
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Ezequiel Garcia
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Rich Freeman
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Kent Fredric
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Pacho Ramos
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Alexey Shvetsov
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver William Hubbs
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Michał Górny
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver William Hubbs
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Matt Turner
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Justin
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Michael Weber
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Matt Turner
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Alexey Shvetsov
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Michael Weber
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Alexey Shvetsov
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Dan Douglas
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Michael Weber
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Kent Fredric
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Michał Górny
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Ralph Sennhauser
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Rich Freeman
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Alec Warner
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Kent Fredric
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Ulrich Mueller
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Kent Fredric
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Alec Warner
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Michał Górny
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Kent Fredric
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Ian Stakenvicius
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Ciaran McCreesh
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Kent Fredric
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Markos Chandras
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Dan Douglas
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Dan Douglas
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - Handling Pull Requests (Was: clean cut or git-cvsserver) Aaron W. Swenson
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - Handling Pull Requests (Was: clean cut or git-cvsserver) Alexey Shvetsov
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - Handling Pull Requests (Was: clean cut or git-cvsserver) Kent Fredric
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - Handling Pull Requests (Was: clean cut or git-cvsserver) Alexey Shvetsov
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - Handling Pull Requests (Was: clean cut or git-cvsserver) Kent Fredric
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - Handling Pull Requests (Was: clean cut or git-cvsserver) Dan Douglas
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - Handling Pull Requests (Was: clean cut or git-cvsserver) Rich Freeman
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - Handling Pull Requests (Was: clean cut or git-cvsserver) Maxim Kammerer
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Michał Górny
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Dan Douglas
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Duncan
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Dan Douglas
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Vítor Brandão
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Duncan
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Dirkjan Ochtman
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Ciaran McCreesh
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Kent Fredric
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Michael Weber
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Mark Wright
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Ultrabug
• [gentoo-dev] So... Andreas K. Huettel
• [gentoo-dev] dev-libs/libusb -> virtual/libusb, please, check your overlays Samuli Suominen
• [gentoo-dev] Help required with getting new media-gfx/graphviz in tree. Samuli Suominen
• [gentoo-dev] anybody interested in writing a Perl ebuild? Grant
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] anybody interested in writing a Perl ebuild? Robin H. Johnson
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] anybody interested in writing a Perl ebuild? Grant
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] anybody interested in writing a Perl ebuild? Robin H. Johnson
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] anybody interested in writing a Perl ebuild? Grant
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] anybody interested in writing a Perl ebuild? Kent Fredric
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] anybody interested in writing a Perl ebuild? Grant
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] anybody interested in writing a Perl ebuild? Kent Fredric
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] anybody interested in writing a Perl ebuild? Grant
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] anybody interested in writing a Perl ebuild? Kent Fredric
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] anybody interested in writing a Perl ebuild? Grant
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] anybody interested in writing a Perl ebuild? Kent Fredric
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] anybody interested in writing a Perl ebuild? Grant
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] anybody interested in writing a Perl ebuild? Kent Fredric
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] anybody interested in writing a Perl ebuild? David Abbott
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] anybody interested in writing a Perl ebuild? Kent Fredric
• [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask Samuli Suominen
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask Michael Weber
• [gentoo-dev] Lastrite x11-wm/parti (replaced by x11-wm/xpra) Michael Weber
• [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6.* unmasked, 4.7.0 added to tree Ryan Hill
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6.* unmasked, 4.7.0 added to tree Mark Loeser
• [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Alexandre Rostovtsev
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Pacho Ramos
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Zac Medico
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Pacho Ramos
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Zac Medico
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Mike Frysinger
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Ryan Hill
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Zac Medico
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Ryan Hill
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Markos Chandras
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Francesco Riosa
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Francesco Riosa
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Francesco Riosa
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Michał Górny
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Petteri Räty
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Ryan Hill
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Ciaran McCreesh
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Ryan Hill
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Michael
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Pacho Ramos
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Markos Chandras
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Pacho Ramos
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! Kacper Kowalik
• [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2012-05-20 23h59 UTC Robin H. Johnson
• [gentoo-dev] enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass hasufell
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass Alexis Ballier
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass hasufell
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass Jonathan Callen
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass hasufell
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass Mike Gilbert
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass Michał Górny
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass Samuli Suominen
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass hasufell
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass hasufell
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass hasufell
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass hasufell
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass Michał Górny
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass hasufell
• [gentoo-dev] Lastrite ~app-text/kiwix-0.9_beta5 (for using vulnerable copy of net-libs/xulrunner) Samuli Suominen
• [gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes? Michał Górny
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes? Fabio Erculiani
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes? Maxim Kammerer
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes? Marien Zwart
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes? Walter Dnes
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes? Samuli Suominen
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes? Walter Dnes
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes? Maxim Kammerer
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes? Dan Douglas
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes? Michael Weber
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes? Dan Douglas
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes? Michał Górny
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes? Kent Fredric
• [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog (was: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: autotools.eclass) Samuli Suominen
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog (was: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: autotools.eclass) Michał Górny
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog (was: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: autotools.eclass) Nirbheek Chauhan
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog (was: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: autotools.eclass) Andreas K. Huettel
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog Michael Weber
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog Fabio Erculiani
  • Git migration (2012) (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog) Pacho Ramos
  • Re: Git migration (2012) (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog) Dirkjan Ochtman
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog Markos Chandras
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog hasufell
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog Ian Stakenvicius
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog (was: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: autotools.eclass) Alec Warner
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove eclass/ChangeLog (was: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: autotools.eclass) Ryan Hill
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove eclass/ChangeLog Samuli Suominen
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove eclass/ChangeLog Rich Freeman
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove eclass/ChangeLog Michał Górny
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove eclass/ChangeLog Markos Chandras
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove eclass/ChangeLog Ryan Hill
• [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass:eautoreconf now runs autopoint for you Mike Frysinger

• Earlier messages