gentoo-dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:58:27 GMT

2012/02/12 -- Paweł Hajdan, Jr.

Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy

Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:12:02 GMT

2012/02/12 -- Sergei Trofimovich

Re: [gentoo-dev] media-video/nvidia-settings is orphan for a long time

Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:34:35 GMT

2012/02/12 -- Fabio Erculiani

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: net-im/skysentials, sys-power/powersoftplus, net-dns/dlint, x11-misc/genmenu

Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:37:20 GMT

2012/02/12 -- Pacho Ramos

[gentoo-dev] Lastrites: x11-terms/wterm, dev-lang/cm3-bin

Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:38:53 GMT

2012/02/12 -- Pacho Ramos

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: media-sound/alsa-driver

Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:20:34 GMT

2012/02/12 -- Pacho Ramos

[gentoo-dev] media-video/nvidia-settings is orphan for a long time

Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:16:09 GMT

2012/02/12 -- Pacho Ramos

[gentoo-dev] New global use flag: ayatana

Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:45:14 GMT

2012/02/12 -- Markos Chandras

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:01:18 GMT

2012/02/12 -- Fabian Groffen

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:02:31 GMT

2012/02/12 -- Ian Stakenvicius

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-php/pecl-idn dev-php/pecl-enchant

Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:41:58 GMT

2012/02/11 -- Ole Markus With

Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy

Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:37:32 GMT

2012/02/11 -- Sergei Trofimovich

Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy

Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:44:41 GMT

2012/02/11 -- Sergei Trofimovich

Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy

Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:59:44 GMT

2012/02/11 -- Sergei Trofimovich

Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy

Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:10:06 GMT

2012/02/11 -- Markos Chandras

[gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy

Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:33:59 GMT

2012/02/11 -- Sergei Trofimovich

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:04:16 GMT

2012/02/11 -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:25:49 GMT

2012/02/11 -- Michał Górny

[gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:00:55 GMT

2012/02/11 -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why?

Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:00:43 GMT

2012/02/11 -- Dale

[gentoo-dev] Re: The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why?

Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:47:18 GMT

2012/02/11 -- Ryan Hill

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-shells/ksh

Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:45:55 GMT

2012/02/11 -- Mike Gilbert

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why?

Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:20:43 GMT

2012/02/11 -- Zac Medico

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why?

Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:09:59 GMT

2012/02/11 -- Hilco Wijbenga

[gentoo-dev] Re: The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why?

Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:09:42 GMT

2012/02/11 -- Ryan Hill

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-laptop/thinkpad app-laptop/tpctl app-laptop/configure-thinkpad

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:48:51 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Markos Chandras

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-shells/ksh

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:40:28 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Markos Chandras

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-emulation/{libdsk,lib765}

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:33:44 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Markos Chandras

Re: [gentoo-dev] The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why?

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:22:35 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Hilco Wijbenga

Re: [gentoo-dev] The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why?

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:29:49 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Zac Medico

Re: [gentoo-dev] The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why?

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:29:28 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Markos Chandras

Re: [gentoo-dev] The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why?

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:23:38 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Matt Turner

Re: [gentoo-dev] The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why?

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:18:11 GMT

2012/02/10 -- ross smith

[gentoo-dev] The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why?

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:50:54 GMT

2012/02/10 -- Hilco Wijbenga

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due dertobi123 retirement

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:28:50 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due dertobi123 retirement

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:10:52 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Michael Haubenwallner

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due dertobi123 retirement

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:24:03 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Bernard Cafarelli

[gentoo-dev] tla.eclass is orphan

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:26:49 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Pacho Ramos

[gentoo-dev] About masking net-misc/mDNSResponder for removal

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:41:26 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Pacho Ramos

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due dertobi123 retirement

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:49:50 GMT

2012/02/09 -- Pacho Ramos

Re: [gentoo-dev] Understanding the LINGUAS variable and use-expand

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:05:04 GMT

2012/02/08 -- Mart Raudsepp

[gentoo-dev] Understanding the LINGUAS variable and use-expand

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:32:39 GMT

2012/02/08 -- Mike Gilbert

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:31:56 GMT

2012/02/07 -- Alexandre Rostovtsev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:34:02 GMT

2012/02/07 -- William Hubbs

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:13:03 GMT

2012/02/07 -- Ian Stakenvicius

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:58:44 GMT

2012/02/07 -- Alec Warner

[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:47:30 GMT

2012/02/07 -- Duncan

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:44:47 GMT

2012/02/07 -- William Hubbs

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:39:36 GMT

2012/02/07 -- Ian Stakenvicius

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:28:55 GMT

2012/02/07 -- Alexandre Rostovtsev

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:44:34 GMT

2012/02/07 -- William Hubbs

[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:22:06 GMT

2012/02/07 -- Duncan

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:33:57 GMT

2012/02/07 -- Alexandre Rostovtsev

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:42:11 GMT

2012/02/07 -- William Hubbs

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net

Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:15:31 GMT

2012/02/06 -- Alexandre Rostovtsev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping localepurge

Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:39:14 GMT

2012/02/06 -- Piotr Szymaniak

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net

Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:36:57 GMT

2012/02/06 -- Zac Medico

[gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net

Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:05:56 GMT

2012/02/06 -- William Hubbs

Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer needed: app-office/libreoffice, app-office/libreoffice-bin, app-office/libreoffice-l10n

Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:40:59 GMT

2012/02/06 -- Pacho Ramos

[gentoo-dev] news item: baselayout-1 deprecation

Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:44:36 GMT

2012/02/06 -- William Hubbs

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2012-02-05 23h59 UTC

Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:25:20 GMT

2012/02/06 -- Robin H. Johnson

[gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass and base.eclass integration

Sun, 05 Feb 2012 05:21:05 GMT

2012/02/05 -- Mike Frysinger

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:27:28 GMT

2012/02/04 -- Rich Freeman

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:31:33 GMT

2012/02/04 -- Alexey Shvetsov

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-kernel/kerneloops

Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:28:41 GMT

2012/02/04 -- Markos Chandras

[gentoo-dev] Lat rites: app-portage/autounmask

Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:20:28 GMT

2012/02/04 -- Markos Chandras

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass

Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:15:36 GMT

2012/02/03 -- Dan Douglas

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass

Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:11:25 GMT

2012/02/03 -- Nirbheek Chauhan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass

Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:03:54 GMT

2012/02/03 -- Mike Frysinger

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass

Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:45:33 GMT

2012/02/03 -- Nirbheek Chauhan

[gentoo-dev] Maintainer needed: app-office/libreoffice, app-office/libreoffice-bin, app-office/libreoffice-l10n

Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:19:55 GMT

2012/02/03 -- Andreas K. Huettel

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass

Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:56:51 GMT

2012/02/03 -- Mike Frysinger

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise

Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:32:03 GMT

2012/02/03 -- Alec Warner

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise

Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:52:29 GMT

2012/02/03 -- Samuli Suominen

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass

Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:28:51 GMT

2012/02/03 -- Gilles Dartiguelongue

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise

Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:10:38 GMT

2012/02/03 -- Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise

Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:44:47 GMT

2012/02/02 -- Mike Frysinger

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise

Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:21:51 GMT

2012/02/02 -- Markos Chandras

[gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise

Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:56:20 GMT

2012/02/02 -- Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-apps/twiki

Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:09:42 GMT

2012/02/02 -- Markos Chandras

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-apps/twiki

Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:09:33 GMT

2012/02/02 -- Markos Chandras

Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass

Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:24:51 GMT

2012/02/02 -- Mike Frysinger

Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass

Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:18:40 GMT

2012/02/02 -- Mike Frysinger

Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass

Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:05:38 GMT

2012/02/02 -- Michał Górny

Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass

Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:33:53 GMT

2012/02/02 -- Mike Frysinger

Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass

Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:10:34 GMT

2012/02/01 -- Michał Górny

Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass

Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:12:02 GMT

2012/02/01 -- Alexandre Rostovtsev

Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass

Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:55:45 GMT

2012/02/01 -- Mike Frysinger

Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass

Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:50:22 GMT

2012/02/01 -- Michał Górny

Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass

Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:44:11 GMT

2012/02/01 -- Mike Frysinger

Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass

Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:28:52 GMT

2012/02/01 -- Michał Górny

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass

Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:14:50 GMT

2012/02/01 -- Nirbheek Chauhan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor?

Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:08:35 GMT

2012/02/01 -- Mike Frysinger

[gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass

Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:05:39 GMT

2012/02/01 -- Mike Frysinger

[gentoo-dev] RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass

Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:26:16 GMT

2012/02/01 -- Nirbheek Chauhan

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into?

Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:27:38 GMT

2012/02/01 -- Sebastian Pipping

Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor?

Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:34:37 GMT

2012/02/01 -- prometheanfire

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into?

Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:42:39 GMT

2012/02/01 -- ScytheMan

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into?

Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:16:35 GMT

2012/02/01 -- Alexandre Rostovtsev

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: FlowScan, CUFlow, and JKFlow

Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:13:09 GMT

2012/02/01 -- Samuli Suominen