I would look at python 3 - I couldn't emerge until only 2.6 was active. I
don't know how but on the new machine I set up, python3 was selected as
active, I set it back to 2.6 and everything was fine.  From the output I can
see there is a version of python 3 active. Maybe a red herring, if so, I
apologies :)

When I had the problem I went on irc and it was suggested that I do a
revdep-rebuild which I did also.



On 25 March 2011 16:42, Dale <rdalek1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Jacques Montier wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I upgraded python2.6 to python2.7,
>> then i run eselect python set python2.7,
>> then python-updater.
>>
>> Here is the python-updater output :
>>
>> * Starting Python Updater...
>>  * Main active version of Python:  2.7
>>  * Active version of Python 2:     2.7
>>  * Active version of Python 3:     3.1
>>  *   Adding to list: app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs:0
>>  *   Adding to list: app-emulation/virtualbox-bin:0
>>  *   Adding to list: app-office/libreoffice-bin:0
>>  *   Adding to list: dev-libs/boost:1.42
>>  *     check: manual [Added to list manually, see CHECKS in manpage for
>> more information.]
>>  *   Adding to list: sys-libs/tdb:0
>>  *   Adding to list: x11-libs/vte:0
>>  *     check: manual [Added to list manually, see CHECKS in manpage for
>> more information.]
>>  * emerge -Dv1 --keep-going app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs:0
>> app-emulation/virtualbox-bin:0 app-office/libreoffice-bin:0
>> dev-libs/boost:1.42 sys-libs/tdb:0 x11-libs/vte:0
>> ...............................
>> Ok, everything emerge fine.
>>
>> If i run python-updater again, then i get exactly the same output as
>> before (emerging emul-linux-x86-baselibs:0, BOOST:1.42, etc...)
>>
>> What's wrong ??
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>
> That seems a bit odd but it depends on what you have installed.  I have KDE
> on mine and it is in the process of rebuilding a little over 50 packages.
>  Most of them are small except for OOo.  Natuarally when anything gets
> updated that monster has to be recompiled.  lol  If you have KDE, I would
> think it would rebuild more than that.  Also, it seems most of mine is
> @system packages.  I would not reboot or logout yet just to be safe.
>
> Anyone notice it wants to rebuild a binary on the OPs system?  Hmmm.
>
> Dale
>
> :-)  :-)
>
>

Reply via email to