On 19/03/2012 10:18 PM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
On 03/19/12 22:02, Michael Mol wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Mark Knecht<markkne...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Andrew Lowe<a...@wht.com.au> wrote:
Hi all,
[snip]
...
...
[snip]
which currently ranks at 151 in the top 500 list :) It's amazing how
fast this list changes, 6 months ago, this machine was at 107 and 6
months before that 87.
Andrew
Just in closing on this subject, thanks to those who responded, have a
quick look at this page from the llvm/clang project:
http://clang.llvm.org/diagnostics.html
For my non FEA/CFD programming, I don't care if clang is 5 - 10% slower
than gcc, the diagnostic output that clang produces looks to be
"spectacular" in comparison to gcc and will be enough for me to dump gcc
and shift to clang.
Andrew
