On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Joey Hess <i...@joeyh.name> wrote:
>
> Attacks using this SHA1 break will look something more like:
We don't actually know what the break is, but it's likely that you
can't actually do what you think you can do:
> * I push a "bad" object to a repo on github I set up under a
> pseudonym.
> * I publish a "good" object in a commit and convince the maintainer to
> merge it.
It's not clear that the "good" object can be anything sane.
What you describe pretty much already requires a pre-image attack,
which the new attack is _not_.
The new attack doesn't have a controlled "good" case, you need two
different objects that both have "near-collision" blocks in the
middle. I don't know what the format of those near-collision blocks
are, but it's a big problem.
You blithely just say "I create a good object". It's not that simple.
If it was, this would be a pre-image attack.
So basically, the attack needs some kind of random binary garbage in
*both* objects in the middle.
That's why pdf's are the classic model for showing these attacks: it's
easy to insert garbage in the middle of a pdf that is invisible.
In a psf, you can just define a bitmap that you don't use for printing
- but you can use them to then make a decision about what to print -
making the printed version of the pdf look radically different in ways
that are not so much _directly_ about the invisible block itself.
Linus
