Teotonio . R . de . Souza . teodesouza
Tue, 20 Jul 2004 13:50:30 -0700
I can only partially agree with some of the applications by Dr. Sergio of my distinction between "colonization" and "colonialism". The distinction helps to understand the difference in the economic base of these processes, but it does not necessarily imply that colonization was benevolent as opposed to colonialism. Goa faced greater social and cultural disturbances during the phase which may be called pre-colonial phase. That was the time the Jesuit missionary zeal and the Inquisition zeal played havoc. For good, for bad? More good than bad? There is no one opinion as we all know.
Portugal had no imperial ambitions? I believe that it only lacked the means
The Portuguese royalty itself was on the run (or rather, taken to Brasil by
the English navy) following the Napoleonic invasion of Portugal, and the
country could not keep pace with the great industrial-imperial powers that
took over the control of Asia from the late 19th century. The famous
British ultimatum" appears in the histories of Portugal as a moment of deep
national humiliation. It caused political convulsions in Portugal at that
time. Portugal tried to make a show of its "imperial" power ("para o inglês
ver" as the Portuguese saying goes) with the so-called "pacification"
campaigns in Africa, and extending them also to Goa. The expeditionary force
led by a Portuguese prince at the close of the 19th century was a part of
that display! It only contributed to making heroes of the Ranes! The British
press in India described the Portuguese pacification campaign at that time
as "playing at toy-soldiers"! As described by the Jesuit Antonio Vieira in
the 17th century, and by Boxer and Subrahmanyam in their more recent studies
the Portuguese were treated as "kaffirs" of Europe by the North European
rivals. Fortunately today Durão Barroso is chose to lead the European
Union! An historic triumph? At least the former President Dr. Mario Soares
is not of this opinion. A partisan view, or a critical judgement? History
will tell.
As to the suggestion (or provocation?) of Dr. Sergio that Konkani may be a
Goan creole, I leave it to more competent people at Thomas Stephen Konkani
Kendra and other academic centres in Goa give their studied opinion! As
regards Cunha Rivara, I agree with Dr. Sergio, but would suggest reading my
Introduction to the book *Goa and the Revolt of 1787* published by XCHR. How
about the novel "Jacob and Dulce" by GIP?
Teotonio R. de Souza
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creole_language#Arabic_creoles
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malay-based_creoles
-------------------------------------------------------------------
To Subscribe/Unsubscribe from Goa-Research-Net
-------------------------------------------------------------------
* Send us a brief self-intro to justify your interest in this
"specialized" forum. This should be sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT [EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Leave SUBJECT blank
* On first line of the BODY of your message, type:
subscribe goa-research-net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or
unsubscribe goa-research-net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------