guile-devel  

Messages by Thread

• Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, stable-2.0, updated. v2.0.5-158-g15bb587 Ludovic Courtès
• Error in wip-rtl Noah Lavine
  • Re: Error in wip-rtl Andy Wingo
• a few proposed patches Ken Raeburn
  • Re: a few proposed patches Neil Jerram
  • Re: a few proposed patches Andy Wingo
  • Re: a few proposed patches Ken Raeburn
  • Re: a few proposed patches Andy Wingo
  • Re: a few proposed patches Andy Wingo
  • Re: a few proposed patches Ken Raeburn
• problems evaluating code depending on version Stefan Israelsson Tampe
  • Re: problems evaluating code depending on version Andy Wingo
  • Re: problems evaluating code depending on version Stefan Israelsson Tampe
  • Re: problems evaluating code depending on version Andy Wingo
  • Re: problems evaluating code depending on version Stefan Israelsson Tampe
• bug in syntax-case in master Stefan Israelsson Tampe
  • bug in syntax-case in master Stefan Israelsson Tampe
• terribly complex syntax objects in syntax parse Stefan Israelsson Tampe
  • Re: terribly complex syntax objects in syntax parse Mark H Weaver
  • Re: terribly complex syntax objects in syntax parse Stefan Israelsson Tampe
  • Re: terribly complex syntax objects in syntax parse Andy Wingo
• how to implement mutual recursive parsers in syntax-parse Stefan Israelsson Tampe
  • Re: how to implement mutual recursive parsers in syntax-parse Andy Wingo
  • Re: how to implement mutual recursive parsers in syntax-parse Stefan Israelsson Tampe
  • Re: how to implement mutual recursive parsers in syntax-parse Andy Wingo
  • Re: how to implement mutual recursive parsers in syntax-parse Stefan Israelsson Tampe
  • Re: how to implement mutual recursive parsers in syntax-parse Andy Wingo
  • Re: how to implement mutual recursive parsers in syntax-parse Stefan Israelsson Tampe
• Making every goops object applicable Krister Svanlund
  • Re: Making every goops object applicable Mark H Weaver
  • Fwd: Making every goops object applicable Krister Svanlund
  • Re: Making every goops object applicable Mark H Weaver
  • Re: Making every goops object applicable Neil Jerram
  • Re: Making every goops object applicable Mark H Weaver
  • Re: Making every goops object applicable Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Making every goops object applicable Andy Wingo
• [Proposal] Why not add a "shell" procedure? Nala Ginrut
  • Re: [Proposal] Why not add a "shell" procedure? Nala Ginrut
  • Re: [Proposal] Why not add a "shell" procedure? Thien-Thi Nguyen
  • Re: [Proposal] Why not add a "shell" procedure? Nala Ginrut
  • Re: [Proposal] Why not add a "shell" procedure? Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Proposal] Why not add a "shell" procedure? Nala Ginrut
  • Re: [Proposal] Why not add a "shell" procedure? Nelson H. F. Beebe
  • Re: [Proposal] Why not add a "shell" procedure? Nala Ginrut
• Wish List Sjoerd van Leent
  • Re: Wish List Ian Price
• Register VM WIP Andy Wingo
  • Re: Register VM WIP Stefan Israelsson Tampe
  • Re: Register VM WIP Andy Wingo
  • Re: Register VM WIP Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Register VM WIP Andrew Gwozdziewycz
  • Re: Register VM WIP Andy Wingo
  • Re: Register VM WIP Noah Lavine
  • Re: Register VM WIP Mark H Weaver
  • Re: Register VM WIP Andy Wingo
  • Re: Register VM WIP Mark H Weaver
  • Re: Register VM WIP David Kastrup
  • Re: Register VM WIP Noah Lavine
  • Re: Register VM WIP Andy Wingo
  • Re: Register VM WIP Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Register VM WIP Andy Wingo
  • Re: Register VM WIP Mark H Weaver
  • Re: Register VM WIP Andy Wingo
  • Re: Register VM WIP Noah Lavine
  • Re: Register VM WIP Andy Wingo
  • Re: Register VM WIP Andy Wingo
• GOOPs, MOP and slots David Spångberg
  • Re: GOOPs, MOP and slots Andy Wingo
• SRFI 64 and SRFI 78 Sunjoong Lee
• Re: SRFI-64 module and SRFI-78 module -- archive file attached Sunjoong Lee
  • Re: SRFI-64 module and SRFI-78 module -- archive file attached Noah Lavine
  • Re: SRFI-64 module and SRFI-78 module -- archive file attached Sunjoong Lee
  • Re: SRFI-64 module and SRFI-78 module -- archive file attached Sunjoong Lee
• patch to guile to allow c-code closure interaction for logic programming Stefan Israelsson Tampe
  • Re: patch to guile to allow c-code closure interaction for logic programming Andy Wingo
  • Re: patch to guile to allow c-code closure interaction for logic programming Stefan Israelsson Tampe
• stack closures for guile-log Stefan Israelsson Tampe
  • Re: stack closures for guile-log Andy Wingo
  • Re: stack closures for guile-log Stefan Israelsson Tampe
• syntax parse link Stefan Israelsson Tampe
  • Re: syntax parse link Andy Wingo
  • Re: syntax parse link Stefan Israelsson Tampe
  • Re: syntax parse link Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: syntax parse link Stefan Israelsson Tampe
  • Re: syntax parse link Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: syntax parse link Stefan Israelsson Tampe
  • Re: syntax parse link Alex Shinn
• Empty entries in $GUILE_LOAD_PATH Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Empty entries in $GUILE_LOAD_PATH Mark H Weaver
  • Re: Empty entries in $GUILE_LOAD_PATH Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Empty entries in $GUILE_LOAD_PATH Andy Wingo
• Psyntax security hole prevents secure sandboxing in Guile Mark H Weaver
  • Re: Psyntax security hole prevents secure sandboxing in Guile Noah Lavine
  • Re: Psyntax security hole prevents secure sandboxing in Guile Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Psyntax security hole prevents secure sandboxing in Guile Mark H Weaver
  • Re: Psyntax security hole prevents secure sandboxing in Guile Noah Lavine
  • Re: Psyntax security hole prevents secure sandboxing in Guile Andreas Rottmann
  • Re: Psyntax security hole prevents secure sandboxing in Guile Ludovic Courtès
• Performance tracking Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Performance tracking Noah Lavine
  • Re: Performance tracking David Kastrup
  • Re: Performance tracking Noah Lavine
  • Re: Performance tracking David Kastrup
  • Re: Performance tracking Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Performance tracking dsmich
  • Re: Performance tracking Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Performance tracking dsmich
• Our temporary guildhall package repository down? Nala Ginrut
  • Re: Our temporary guildhall package repository down? Andy Wingo
  • Re: Our temporary guildhall package repository down? Nala Ginrut
• [PATCH] Turn on more documentation Noah Lavine
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation Noah Lavine
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation Noah Lavine
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation Noah Lavine
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation Noah Lavine
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation Noah Lavine
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation Andy Wingo
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation Noah Lavine
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation dsmich
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation Andy Wingo
• Do you recognize these modules? Noah Lavine
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules? Thien-Thi Nguyen
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules? Noah Lavine
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules? Thien-Thi Nguyen
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules? Noah Lavine
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules? David Kastrup
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules? Noah Lavine
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules? David Kastrup
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules? Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules? Thien-Thi Nguyen
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules? Noah Lavine
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules? Andy Wingo
• Do we have a guile-1.8 branch? Noah Lavine
  • Re: Do we have a guile-1.8 branch? Thien-Thi Nguyen
  • Re: Do we have a guile-1.8 branch? dsmich
  • Re: Do we have a guile-1.8 branch? Noah Lavine
  • Re: Do we have a guile-1.8 branch? Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Do we have a guile-1.8 branch? Noah Lavine
  • Re: Do we have a guile-1.8 branch? Andy Wingo
• Continuing experiences with guile log optimisations Stefan Israelsson Tampe
• Patches for module/ice-9/occam-channel.scm Daniel Krueger
  • Re: Patches for module/ice-9/occam-channel.scm Noah Lavine
  • Re: Patches for module/ice-9/occam-channel.scm Nala Ginrut
  • Re: Patches for module/ice-9/occam-channel.scm Andrew Gwozdziewycz
  • Re: Patches for module/ice-9/occam-channel.scm Daniel Krueger
  • Re: Patches for module/ice-9/occam-channel.scm Noah Lavine
  • Re: Patches for module/ice-9/occam-channel.scm Mark H Weaver
  • Re: Patches for module/ice-9/occam-channel.scm Daniel Krueger
• [PATCH] Fix Ecmascript's tree-il compiling Nala Ginrut
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix Ecmascript's tree-il compiling Noah Lavine
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix Ecmascript's tree-il compiling Nala Ginrut
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix Ecmascript's tree-il compiling Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix Ecmascript's tree-il compiling Nala Ginrut
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix Ecmascript's tree-il compiling Nala Ginrut
• Let's Talk About Backtraces and Stacks Noah Lavine
• vm ops and threading discussion for guile-log Stefan Israelsson Tampe
• Problems with compilation on Trisquel 5.5 Sjoerd van Leent
  • Re: Problems with compilation on Trisquel 5.5 Sjoerd van Leent
  • Re: Problems with compilation on Trisquel 5.5 Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Problems with compilation on Trisquel 5.5 Andy Wingo
  • Re: Problems with compilation on Trisquel 5.5 Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Problems with compilation on Trisquel 5.5 Andy Wingo
  • Re: Problems with compilation on Trisquel 5.5 Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Problems with compilation on Trisquel 5.5 Sjoerd van Leent
  • Re: Problems with compilation on Trisquel 5.5 Sjoerd van Leent
  • Re: Problems with compilation on Trisquel 5.5 Sjoerd van Leent
• our benchmark-suite Andy Wingo
  • Re: our benchmark-suite Andy Wingo
  • Re: our benchmark-suite Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: our benchmark-suite Neil Jerram
  • Re: our benchmark-suite Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: our benchmark-suite Neil Jerram
  • Re: our benchmark-suite Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: our benchmark-suite Andy Wingo
  • Re: our benchmark-suite Neil Jerram
  • Re: our benchmark-suite Andy Wingo
  • Re: our benchmark-suite Ludovic Courtès
• simple syntax expression faiilure, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
  • Re: simple syntax expression faiilure, Daniel Krueger
  • Re: simple syntax expression faiilure, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
  • Re: simple syntax expression faiilure, Ian Price
  • Re: simple syntax expression faiilure, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
• Re: bug#11262: help text fro sorted? predicate is wrong/misleading. Noah Lavine
  • Re: bug#11262: help text fro sorted? predicate is wrong/misleading. Alexei Matveev
• Broken Backtraces, and Part of a Solution Noah Lavine
  • Re: Broken Backtraces, and Part of a Solution Noah Lavine
  • Re: Broken Backtraces, and Part of a Solution Andy Wingo
  • Re: Broken Backtraces, and Part of a Solution Noah Lavine
  • Re: Broken Backtraces, and Part of a Solution Andy Wingo
  • Re: Broken Backtraces, and Part of a Solution Noah Lavine
  • Re: Broken Backtraces, and Part of a Solution Noah Lavine
  • Re: Broken Backtraces, and Part of a Solution Andy Wingo
  • Re: Broken Backtraces, and Part of a Solution Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Broken Backtraces, and Part of a Solution Noah Lavine
  • Re: Broken Backtraces, and Part of a Solution Ludovic Courtès

• Earlier messages