Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 02:20:59 -0800
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Christian Brolin wrote: > What?? The compiler knows the full name of the module without the module > clause. It does not. File A/B/C/D.hs can be module A.B.C.D, or module B.C.D which happened to be placed in a directory A, or C.D etc. It's ambiguous. I'm not saying that I want to have to write full paths, but I see no other choice. > The dots was just my suggestion of a syntax for relative addresses. > One dot: Relative to the parent of this module. > Two dots: Relative to this module. It's confusing. If at all, it should be the opposite, analogous to . and .. directories. But it doesn't look clear either. -- Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell