haskell  

Re: [Haskell] Extensible records: Static duck typing

Cale Gibbard
Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:00:44 -0800

On 05/02/2008, Cale Gibbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally, I think pt{x} for extracting the x field of pt seems 
> not-so-unreasonable, and meshes
> well with the existing syntax for record updates.

I should clarify -- this is only if we can't somehow keep the existing
function syntax for record extraction.
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell