Thanks Michael and Matt.

Were they all collected at the same site? If not, I'd expect this to make
some difference.

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wustl.edu>
wrote:

> It is a variable in the .csv you download out of the database.  Diffusion
> isn’t affected by this, just fMRI because diffusion was processed with the
> same recon version (old scans were reprocessed).
>
> Peace,
>
> Matt.
>
> From: Joelle Zimmermann <joelle.t.zimmerm...@gmail.com>
> Date: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 12:58 PM
> To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu>
> Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] comparison across acquisitions
>
> Thanks for your reply Matt.
>
> By version number, do you mean the "acquisition" - that is, the Q#?
>
> So you expect the fMRI to be more different across acquisitions than the
> diffusion?
>
> Do you recall at which acquisition the image reconstruction version change
> occurred?
>
> Joelle
>
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wustl.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> The main thing to consider was a an image reconstruction version change
>> that occurred relatively early in the project.  Diffusion data were
>> retroreconned (and so all data have the same version), but fMRI raw data
>> had not been saved and could not be retroreconned.  We advise using a
>> covariate of no interest for version number.
>>
>> Peace,
>>
>> Matt.
>>
>> From: <hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org> on behalf of Joelle
>> Zimmermann <joelle.t.zimmerm...@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 12:48 PM
>> To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
>> Subject: [HCP-Users] comparison across acquisitions
>>
>> Hi HCPers,
>>
>> I'm working with structural and functional connectomes from the S900 HCP.
>> I'm wondering how the different acquisitions (ie Q1 Q2 etc) and releases
>> would affect comparison across all SCs for example. Was data collected at
>> different sites for example? - which may affect comparison across
>> acquisitions.
>>
>> See below info pasted from behaviour spreadsheet. Do I understand
>> correctly the "Release" column is when subjects were first released. but if
>> i am getting all data from the S900, then I shouldn't care about this first
>> release?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Joelle
>>
>> Subject Release Acquisition
>> 100004 S900 Q06
>> 100206 S900 Q11
>> 100307 Q1 Q01
>> 100408 Q3 Q03
>> 100610 S900 Q08
>> 101006 S500 Q06
>> 101107 S500 Q06
>> 101309 S500 Q06
>> 101410 S500 Q06
>> 101612 S900 Q11
>> 101915 Q3 Q04
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> HCP-Users mailing list
>> HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
>> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected
>> Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you
>> are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use,
>> disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents
>> of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email
>> in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected
> Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you
> are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use,
> disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents
> of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email
> in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
>

_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

Reply via email to