Ignacio Fernández Galván
Sat, 03 Nov 2007 10:40:06 -0800
--- Brian Dessent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Did you not see FX's reply on the fortran list? > <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-11/msg00013.html> His solution > is > cleaner, since it effectively communicates to make that a.mod depends > on > a.f90 and a.o, but without implying that the module can be rebuilt by > calling gfortran -c a.f90. I think the @true part is even extraneous > if > it looks too ugly.
Oh, I hadn't seen FX's answer, sorry. I will reply in the gfortran
list.
Thanks.
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it
now.
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
Help-make mailing list
Help-make@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make