Arthur Prokosch
Fri, 04 Aug 2000 12:17:34 -0700
Geoff Hutchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For debugging, I use: > > CFLAGS="-g -Wall -W" CXXFLAGS="-g -W -Wall" ./configure [other options] compiling with the above gives identical search results (meaning, gives the same false matches) as before. Only noticable change is that 'make' gives a lot more warnings than before (log-make-err has 536 lines, mostly things like "missing initializer", as opposed to 6 when the same source is compiled with default options). So, the optimization isn't it. grr. > Depending on how much you want to work, I'd consider trying the latest > gcc: gcc-2.95.2 from <http://gcc.gnu.org/> It *shouldn't* be a problem > with the compiler, but the gcc releases are carefully checked to > attempt to cut down on compiler bugs with each new release. If there was a gcc binary lying around somewhere, I might give that a try...but I'd rather not compile GCC if I can avoid it. .... Geoff had earlier written: > If it actually gets a null list (rather than an ignored word), it would > return no matches. I've verified this on both the 3.2.0b2 release and the > current snapshots. have you verified on either release that a word giving a null list ANDed with a word giving a populated list returns no matches? That is, have you verified that this bug is completely specific to my machine; or, have you duplicated it on another machine? Thanks again, arthur. ------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You will receive a message to confirm this.