Nuclear Plant Surveillance Continues
 http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,1282,-1252859,00.html

http://www.nandotimes.com/nation/story/147933p-1445750c.html

Saturday October 20, 2001 4:10 PM

NEW YORK (AP) - Gov. George Pataki said around-the clock surveillance of
the Indian Point nuclear power plants will continue, three days after
the Coast Guard announced plans to halt the patrol on the Hudson River.

The governor, who made a visit to the facility Friday morning, said
state and federal officials would continue to assess the long-term
security needs at the facility and the Coast Guard will remain on site
until completion of the review.

On Tuesday, Rear Admiral R.E. Bennis told Entergy Nuclear, the owner of
the power plants, that the Coast Guard would no longer provide 24-hour
security, ``and will be conducting only random patrols in the near
future,'' starting Monday.

Entergy officials said the company was confident it could protect the
plant.

But Rep. Sue Kelly, R-N.Y., whose district includes the two plants,
called the Coast Guard's decision misguided and unwise.

In a letter to James Kallstrom, the state's new anti-terrorism
coordinator, Rep. Nita Lowey, D-Harrison, wrote: ``Your security
expertise is urgently needed at Indian Point. The public must be assured
that Indian Point is secure on all fronts - air, land and water.''

The nation's nuclear power plants - 103 reactors at 64 sites in 31
states - have been under heightened alert since the terrorist attacks.
National Guard troops were assigned by Pataki to nuclear power plants
across the state to provide additional assistance.

The National Guard also has been deployed to reactors in other states.

THE END

==^================================================================
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrHhl.bVKZIr
Or send an email To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This email was sent to: [email protected]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to