RE: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP

[Scott Hollenbeck]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 12:57 PM
> To: Colin Perkins
> Cc: iesg@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and 
> Registration Procedures' to BCP

[snip]

> I'm quite sympathetc to the underlying problem, but IMO this change is
> unacceptable, in that in order to make it work the fact that 
> a given subtype is
> intended for restricted usage would have to be known to the 
> display agent. The
> whole idea of having top-level types is predicated on not 
> needing this sort of
> exception information.

Ned, how would you reconcile the current text in your document with the
practice specified in RFC 3555?  It's been alleged that the documents are
not in alignment.

-Scott-


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf