ilug-cal  

Re: [ilug-cal] [MSFT-WATCHING] MSFT FUD @ work & beating it!

Sayamindu Dasgupta
Tue, 11 Feb 2003 22:42:08 -0800

On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 22:53, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
> but then even when it was declared shared source concept was roundly derided
> for its [pardon me] imbecility and assumption that government's are stupid
> enough to sign a binding clause. the very nature of the concept is based on
> favor-distribution. thus media spiels conforming to MSFT's stand that they
> are opening the hood are part of the spin doctor's campaign. and this is not
> new also. in my professional capacity, i've had the occasional query as to
> that opensource and shared source are one and the same thing. i believe that
> as part of the LUG we have to provide a conclusive pointer to the conceptual
> difference between the 2 processes. As the article so rightly points out :
> 
> "If you contribute to a GPL licenced software package, you still
> retain copyright in your patches. If you contribute to a Shared
> Source package, you hand over your rights to that code. You may
> freely use and distribute the Open Source package you contributed to,
> and the entire industry, including yourself, can potentially benefit
> from it.
> This you have no rights to do with Shared Source. If you wish to
> use the Shared-Source-enabled software from Microsoft that you helped
> to improve, you have to pay for each copy (or at least seat) and have
> no right-to-distribute at all. Microsoft grows at your expense."
> and that by its very nature can be termed parasitic

Hmmm..... 
Parasitic vs Viral ?? ;-)
How about a article on Shared Src. vs. the GPL at the ilug-cal.org site
?
-sdg-




-- 
Sayamindu Dasgupta [ http://www.peacefulaction.org/sayamindu/ ]

=========================================
Speak out on social and cultural issues
                at
        PeacefulAction.Org
    http://www.peacefulaction.org
*****************************************


We gave you an atomic bomb, what do you want, mermaids?
                -- I. I. Rabi to the Atomic Energy Commission


--
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body
"unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line.
FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/node.php?id=3