Carrigan, Ken
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:26:55 -0800
Roamer, You may knock the education system, but you did learn to solve math problems in school? That water does not flow uphill, that the earth is round, and other such physical things. Also many of the uneducated can not discern scams, and are taken to the cleaners. I'm not sure where you sit on overunity, COP>1, but 98% or more of the stuff your seeing, feeling, touching, is scientifically based, and physics can explain most of it. There is about 2-3% that is unexplainable. However, Research is always being done by companies and government and new laws are being developed slowly for this 2-3%. You can not throw laws away (period) but they can be modified to account for additional experimental evidence. Don't pooh-pooh education, the computer your using incorporates many of the laws of physics, and even the CPU uses quantum mechanics laws to govern electron channeling, and wafer depositing. Automobiles, trains, planes, radio, TV, microwaves, lasers, etc all use these laws. I could go on, and you might think I'm sipping too much coffee (I am..) but when someone says I have 110% coming out of something, one has to stand back an assess whether it's true or not, as current laws (again 98% correct) can not be broken. So, I'd love to build a SG, however, I see no benefit from building it, unless it's producing overunity or COP>1. Now if its just 'improving' efficiency, there still is no benefit for me to build it. If the SG takes 12 volts @1 amp and runs a 50% efficiency motor for 10 hours, while a standard 12v input to the motor makes it run for 5 hours, does not prove overunity or COP>1. NASA came up with something similar years ago for motors that improved the efficiency up to 80% (unloaded motors higher efficiency), but it was not termed overunity or COP>1. Unless someone can show me an experiment which proves laws are broken, and overunity exists, not just improved efficiency, I'll pass.. The MEG however, is very interesting, and I'd love to built it, but not sure where the core material can be purchased. v/r Ken Carrigan -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 9:13 AM To: interact Subject: RE: [Keelynet] off the shelf portable generators, can they be made overunity? Ken, You've now had YEARS to put a few simple parts together to do some tests for yourself. Your basic desulphator is not the same. Here's the road less taken: Build a model from a bike wheel, take a nice digital pic of it, then join the Bedini monopole yahoo group and follow the program. The moderator does a nice job of keeping the subject-matter on track and moving forward. Use new batteries, not sulphated scrap. Do some load tests. See whatever you see, for yourself. Spend a few minutes each day without chanting your usual mantra, "can't do it, can't do it, can't do it...." What I SAY about what it can or can't do doesn't really matter much. I could sit here and tell you truths or lies about any number of things and you'd never know either way. I know this because you've always been much happier offering device critiques from your armchair, not your workbench. I don't know of any magical cures for procrastination or for a lack of inquisitive nature. I wish I did, really. I realize that it's a lot more fun to have useless coffee-clutch conversation without ever doing any hands-on work to either prove something wrong or prove it to be real. Do as you will with what you got. Happy Thanksgiving. R