Ken,
I wasn't aware that I was knocking the education system. Although,
I do think that what they teach these day is woefully incomplete.
>So, I'd love to build a SG, however, I see no benefit from building it,
> unless it's producing overunity or COP>1.
Ok, so, like, you would "love to build a SG". Ummm...., not buying that
part of the paragraph for some reason. We're all friends here. You don't
need to tell fibs jsut to be part of the club.
You'd "love" to build one. But, you won't build one because there's no
benefit. What about this so-called "love" for the idea of building. Seems
like you're just making noise now, like a wind-chime.
You're right, Ken. No laws are being broken. None have to be broken
any more than your air conditioner breaks them. If I have to explain
your air conditioner and the definition of C.O.P. then you don't even
know your own laws.
The Bedini monopole yahoo group is there if you choose to use it.
If not for practical purposes, then for an interesting hobby shop exhibit.
Either way, it's up to you to do things for yourself, or not. You've been
around the block. You're a big boy now.
I found it amusing that you popped out of the aether(ha) with that first
post with nothing more in mind than to dump on Bedini a bit. Curious.
It's intersting that you would go out of your way to post about how something
DOESN'T work, as if someone here asked you. Seems like disruptor
behavior to me, not that there's anything to disrupt. A tantrum of some
sort?
Anyway, Bearden has pretty much explained that the same ambient
energy is involved in both the MEG and Bedini technologies, FYI. You
probably "love" the MEG so much that you won't ever build that either.
Maybe in your next thread you could just chant Ohm's law for us a few
times and then pop out with some random, but mostly useless, and maybe
unnecessarily derogitory remarks about something that you "love" but
would never build. That would be some quality posting. Looking forward
to it.
Hey, good news. I lowered my cholesterol by switching to geico.....
Bored now. Gotta go.
R
On 23 Nov 2005 at 10:52, Carrigan, Ken wrote:
> Roamer,
> You may knock the education system, but you did learn to solve math
> problems in...
>
>snip
>
> So, I'd love to build a SG, however, I see no benefit from building it,
> unless it's producing overunity or COP>1. Now if its just 'improving'
> efficiency, there still is no benefit for me to build it. If the SG
> takes 12 volts @1 amp and runs a 50% efficiency motor for 10 hours,
> while a standard 12v input to the motor makes it run for 5 hours, does
> not prove overunity or COP>1. NASA came up with something similar years
> ago for motors that improved the efficiency up to 80% (unloaded motors
> higher efficiency), but it was not termed overunity or COP>1.
>
> Unless someone can show me an experiment which proves laws are broken,
> and overunity exists, not just improved efficiency, I'll pass..
>
> The MEG however, is very interesting, and I'd love to built it, but not
> sure where the core material can be purchased.
> v/r
> Ken Carrigan