Carrigan, Ken
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 18:56:31 -0800
Fundamentally, SG uses lead acid but also applies to Gel. Check out this site for explanation as to what I think is happening. Sulfate is going back into solution, which was deposited on the lead plates much more readily. 2-6MHz spectral pulse will do this, at 2x voltage easily. Everyone should make one for their batteries to keep them fresh. http://www.shaka.com/~kalepa/desulf.htm is a good schematic. What else is the bicycle wheel suppose to produce or do, besides spikes? Some mysterious aether suck-up from magnetics? Please let me know, because so far it is just 'build it' and test, for what?? http://www.vdcelectronics.com/desulphation.htm Every element known to man has a magnetic moment at a resonant frequency ie. a point at which the chemical bonds that hold the molecules together to form a crystal can be broken. Sulphation, the number one cause of early battery failure, is simply crystals of lead sulphate (PbS04) which have formed on the lead storage plates in a lead-acid type battery. When a battery is improperly charged (over/under) or allowed to self discharge as occurs during storage/non-use, these crystals build up on the battery's storage plates preventing the battery from ever being fully charged and therefore able to deliver their full power/capacity. VDC Electronics, Inc. has created a simple method of generating the required resonant frequency (3.26 megahertz pulse) to breakdown the lead sulphate crystals, allowing the molecules to return to the battery's electrolyte. By creating a wave form with the required 3.26 Mhz frequency, coupled with a very fast rise time and a high amplitude pulse, more energy in developed to breakdown sulphation than by any other method believed to exist. This unique approach is now U.S. Patent #6,184.650 B1 dated Feb. 6, 2001. The MEG? Validated by Naudin http://jnaudin.free.fr/meg/megv21.htm My MEG replication seems to be really close to the original device presented in the Bearden's MEG paper and I think that I have been able to replicate and measure the same signals at the Input/Output of the device. I have not used the original electronic and core diagrams from the Bearden's teamwork (because I don't have them..), so may be there are some important differences between the setups. The purpose of this project seems to be achieved : the replication of the MEG signals measured at its output is in line with the original papers and the inventors claims. The MEG works by alternating PM magnetic flux by a gate that is created by high uNI field, and oscillating it by resonance affects. The PM magnetic field then oscillated back and forth in the core and coils capture the (PM + uNI) and transforms it as output. The key is to create the gate with less energy then can be obtained by extraction of PM. What is neat is that PM + uNI can be extracted (input + PM field) on each leg, and does not need lead acid battery or Gel cell to work. A lot different then SG. v/r Ken Carrigan PS, -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Paddock Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 8:15 PM To: interact Subject: Re: [Keelynet] off the shelf portable generators, can they be made overunity? > Ken Carrigan wrote: > So, I'd love to build a SG, however, I see no benefit from building > it, unless it's producing overunity or COP>1. > Unless someone can show me an experiment which proves laws are broken, > and overunity exists, not just improved efficiency, I'll pass.. If Nature is doing something, and our laws say we can't. I'm placing my beats on Nature. There is obviously something very fundamentally flawed in our understanding of how the Universe works. We are always fighting things like Resistance, reactance, heat etc. Yet a tree seems to have no trouble at all growing up, in defiance of gravity. There are no immutable laws, only things that we have yet to learn. > The MEG however, is very interesting, and I'd love to built it, but > not sure where the core material can be purchased. Why are you assuming the fundamental principle of operation between the SG and the MEG is different?