[Keelynet] The Structure of Nothing . According to my peasant logic: 1 + 1 = 2.

[socratus]

The Structure of Nothing . According to my peasant logic: 1 + 1 = 2. A “Big Bang” is abstract hypothesis. Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter  (all elementary particles and all quarks and their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks, all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational,  muons… gluons field ….. etc.) – was assembled in a “single point”.    It is interesting to think about what had surrounded the “single point”. The answer is :  EMPTINESS- NOTHING….!!!  Ok! But why does everyone speak about EMPTINESS- NOTHING in  common phrases rather than in specific, concrete terms?  I wonder why nobody has written down this EMPTINESS- NOTHING in the form of a physical formula ? You see, every schoolboy knows that  is possible to express the EMPTINESS- NOTHING condition by the formula  T=0K. *       *       * Once there was a “Big Bang”.  But in what space had the Big Bang taken place  and in what space was the matter of the Big Bang distributed? Not in  T=0K? It is clear, that there is only EMPTINESS, NOTHING, in  T=0K. Now consider that the Universe, as an absolute frame of reference is  in a condition  of  T = 2,7K  (rests relic radiation of the Big Bang ).  But, the relic radiation is extended and in the future will change and decrease. What temperature can this radiation reach? Not  T=0K? Hence, if we go into the past or into the present or into the future,  we can not escape from EMPTINESS- NOTHING  T=0K. Therefore it is necessary to begin to think from T=0K. http://www.socratus.com