Sebb created NET-463:
------------------------
Summary: Does it make sense for NET classes to be Serializable?
Key: NET-463
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-463
Project: Commons Net
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Sebb
A few of the NET classes currently implement Serializable.
However, it's doubtful that serialization would actually work.
There are no unit tests.
Also, what is the use-case for it?
Can we drop the Serializable references?
The classes that implement Serializable currently are:
ftp.FTPFile
ntp.TimeStamp
util.ListenerList (contains non-serialisable field of type CopyOnWriteArrayList)
ProtocolCommandSupport
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
