[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16018694#comment-16018694
 ] 

Bruno P. Kinoshita commented on COLLECTIONS-602:
------------------------------------------------

For general information on how to contribute, see [this 
page|https://commons.apache.org/patches.html].

Commons Collections is still using Subversion for code management, this is the 
repository https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/collections/trunk

If you are comfortable with Subversion, you can check out that repository, make 
your changes, and follow the information in the first link to create a JIRA 
ticket, and a patch to attach to the ticket with your changes.

If you are more comfortable or prefer to use Git, you can fork 
https://github.com/apache/commons-collections, make all the changes in your own 
forked repository, and then [submit a pull 
request|https://help.github.com/articles/about-pull-requests/].

A committer will review your patch or pull request, and either ask for feedback 
or changes, and then merge it (-:

Hope that helps
Bruno

> Improve efficiency of DefaultedMap.get
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COLLECTIONS-602
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-602
>             Project: Commons Collections
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: John Mark
>              Labels: help-wanted
>
> The current implementation of 
> {{org.apache.commons.collections4.map.DefaultedMap.get()}} is inefficient 
> since it always require two map lookups. There is no need to check 
> map.containsKey() every time. I would suggest implementing this method 
> similar to the way that Java 8 does with {{Map.getOrDefault()}}. My proposed 
> implementation would be something like this:
> {code}
> public V get(final Object key) {
>     V v;
>     return ((v = map.get(key) != null) || map.containsKey(key)) ? v : 
> value.transform((K) key);
> }
> {code}
> It can be further optimized to not even call map.containsKey() if map is 
> known to not contain null values.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to