[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16131175#comment-16131175
]
Oliver Heger commented on CONFIGURATION-670:
--------------------------------------------
So, do I understand correctly that the key passed to the configuration instance
is not resolved correctly?
Any chance that you can provide a unit test or a small test program that
demonstrates the bug? This would help us to reproduce the problem.
Thanks.
> Inconsistency with configurationAt method.
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CONFIGURATION-670
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-670
> Project: Commons Configuration
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Expression engine
> Affects Versions: 2.1.1
> Reporter: Magno Nascimento de Azevedo Cruz
>
> After some testing, I found some inconsistency with the use of
> {{configurationAt()}}, to simplify it, this version is working correctly,
> returning the {{HierarchicalConfiguration}} pointing to the right property:
> {code:java}
> config.configurationAt("property.indexedProperty(0)", false);
> {code}
> While this version, instead of returning a {{HierarchicalConfiguration}} with
> the root tracking node pointing to {{indexedProperty(0)}}, it returns the
> tracking node pointing to the root of the whole tree of properties.
> {code:java}
> config.configurationAt("property.indexedProperty(0)", true);
> {code}
> I'm trying to implement a support to a new format called
> [SURF|https://urf.io/surf/] created by GlobalMentor, but I didn't override
> this method, so I think it's coming from the original implementation.
> More informations may be found at
> [https://globalmentor.atlassian.net/browse/URF-34].
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
