[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16049469#comment-16049469
 ] 

Hudson commented on MNG-6240:
-----------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build maven-3.x #1658 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-3.x/1658/])
[MNG-6240] Duplicate components in plugin extension realm when plugin (gboue: 
[http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/?p=maven.git&a=commit&h=a1fe42199565f76007a97f47cd4a848fd9b63482])
* (edit) maven-core/src/main/resources/META-INF/maven/extension.xml


> Duplicate components in plugin extension realm when plugin depends on 
> maven-aether-resolver
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-6240
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6240
>             Project: Maven
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Class Loading
>    Affects Versions: 3.5.0
>            Reporter: Guillaume Boué
>            Assignee: Guillaume Boué
>             Fix For: 3.5.1
>
>
> When a plugin extension has a dependency on {{maven-aether-resolver}}, the 
> components of this artifact are added into the plugin realm even though Maven 
> Core already provides them. This is a regression introduced by the rename of 
> this module to {{maven-resolver-provider}} in 3.5.0.
> This rename has kept all the classes of {{maven-aether-resolver}} for 
> compatibility, therefore the old artifact name also needs to be exported by 
> Maven Core in {{extension.xml}}.
> A visible side-effect of this is MDEPLOY-221, where the two 
> {{MetadataGeneratorFactory}} components of {{maven-aether-provider}} (which 
> are {{SnapshotMetadataGeneratorFactory}} and 
> {{VersionsMetadataGeneratorFactory}}) are present twice as Guice bindings, 
> and wrong metadata information is deployed as a consequence. This is due to 
> the Flex Mojos plugin extension which depends on {{maven-aether-resolver}} 
> used in the build.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to