[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (MNG-4453) [regression] Plugin versions defined in a lifecycle mapping are not respected

[Paul Benedict (JIRA)]

    [ 
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=198611#action_198611
 ] 

Paul Benedict edited comment on MNG-4453 at 11/18/09 7:14 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

{quote}Second, I always subscribe to the theory that "closest" wins.{quote}

It's more than a theory. It's documented on Maven's web site it's the only 
dependency resolution strategy currently supported.

      was (Author: paul4christ79):
    >> Second, I always subscribe to the theory that "closest" wins.

It's more than a theory. It's documented on Maven's web site it's the only 
resolution strategy it currently supports.
  
> [regression] Plugin versions defined in a lifecycle mapping are not respected
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-4453
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4453
>             Project: Maven 2
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Plugins and Lifecycle
>    Affects Versions: 3.0-alpha-4
>            Reporter: Benjamin Bentmann
>
> As reported by Sebastian Annies in [Using a specific plugin version in custom 
> lifecycle|http://www.mail-archive.com/d...@maven.apache.org/msg82871.html], 
> the plugin version given by a lifecycle mapping like
> {code:xml}
> <verify>org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-source-plugin:2.1:jar-no-fork</verify>
> {code}
> is not respected by Maven 3.0, it's preferring the version from the plugin 
> management of the super POM instead.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira